%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : ALG438-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:15:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 238.39s 238.61s
% Output : Refutation 238.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 3 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_b,v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(cls_mult__pCons__left_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1355)
| c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1358,X1356,X1355),X1357,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1355)) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1358,X1357,X1355),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1355),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1356,X1357,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1355)),X1355),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1355)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__pCons__left_0) ).
cnf(c3932,plain,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X8833,X8831,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X8832,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X8833,X8832,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X8831,X8832,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[cls_mult__pCons__left_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).
cnf(c152207,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3932,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ALG438-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 9 00:24:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 238.39/238.61 % Version: 1.5
% 238.39/238.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 238.39/238.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 238.39/238.61
% 238.39/238.61 % Initial clauses : 456
% 238.39/238.61 % Processed clauses : 7308
% 238.39/238.61 % Factors computed : 125
% 238.39/238.61 % Resolvents computed: 152142
% 238.39/238.61 % Tautologies deleted: 51
% 238.39/238.61 % Forward subsumed : 3369
% 238.39/238.61 % Backward subsumed : 65
% 238.39/238.61 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 238.39/238.61 % User time : 237.787 s
% 238.39/238.61 % System time : 0.456 s
% 238.39/238.61 % Total time : 238.243 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------