↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ALG439-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:54:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.15s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  13   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f942,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : X0 = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X0,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mpoly__base__conv_I2_J_0) ).

fof(f943,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X0,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X0,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f942]) ).

fof(f944,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y
    | v_c != v_y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f945,plain,
    ( v_y != c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
    | v_c != v_y ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f944]) ).

fof(f946,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_c = v_y
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f947,plain,
    ( v_c = v_y
    | v_y = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f946]) ).

tcf(c_965,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( v_c != v_y )
    | ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f945]) ).

tcf(c_966,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( v_c = v_y )
    | ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f947]) ).

tcf(c_967,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X0,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f943]) ).

tcf(c_1377,plain,
    ( ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y )
    | ( v_c != v_y ) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_965]) ).

tcf(c_1378,plain,
    ( ( v_c != v_y )
    | ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_1377]) ).

tcf(c_1379,plain,
    ( ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y )
    | ( v_c = v_y ) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_966]) ).

tcf(c_1380,plain,
    ( ( v_c = v_y )
    | ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_1379]) ).

tcf(c_3479,plain,
    v_c = v_y,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1380,c_967]) ).

tcf(c_3620,plain,
    ( ( v_c != v_y )
    | ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_c ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1378,c_3479]) ).

tcf(c_3621,plain,
    v_c != v_c,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3620,c_967,c_3479]) ).

tcf(c_3622,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_3621]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ALG439-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:34:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.42  % Proving...
% 4.15/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.15/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.15/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.15/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.15/1.28  
% 4.15/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------