↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : ANA007-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:13:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : ANA007-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 04:54:39 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.46/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.46/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.60  
% 0.46/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.60  % File     : ANA007-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.46/0.60  % Domain   : Analysis
% 0.46/0.60  % Problem  : Problem about Big-O notation
% 0.46/0.60  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.46/0.60  % English  :
% 0.46/0.60  
% 0.46/0.60  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.46/0.60  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.46/0.60  % Names    :
% 0.46/0.60  
% 0.46/0.60  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.29 v3.2.0
% 0.46/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   2 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Number of literals    :    8 (   1 equ;   4 neg)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.61  %            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)
% 0.46/0.61  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.46/0.61  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.46/0.61  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.46/0.61  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.46/0.61  %            axioms.
% 0.46/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.61      ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),c_times(V_U,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.61      class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b) ).
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oaxioms__1_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.61      ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)
% 0.46/0.61      | c_lessequals(V_x,V_x,T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__cancel__right1_2,axiom,
% 0.46/0.61      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T_a)
% 0.46/0.61      | V_c = c_times(c_1,V_c,T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_44,axiom,
% 0.46/0.61      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.46/0.61      | class_Orderings_Oorder(T) ) ).
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.46/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.61  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:15)
% 0.46/0.61  %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.46/0.61  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.46/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 0.46/0.61  %SharedTerms:3
% 0.46/0.61  %goalClause: 16 17
% 0.46/0.61  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.46/0.61  [16]P1(a1)
% 0.46/0.61  [17]~P2(f2(f6(f5(x171)),a1),f4(x171,f2(f6(f5(x171)),a1),a1),a1)
% 0.46/0.61  [18]~P1(x181)+P3(x181)
% 0.46/0.61  [20]~P3(x202)+P2(x201,x201,x202)
% 0.46/0.61  [19]~P1(x192)+E(f4(a3,x191,x192),x191)
% 0.46/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.61  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.46/0.61  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.46/0.61  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.46/0.61  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.46/0.61  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x51),f6(x52))
% 0.46/0.61  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x61,x63),f2(x62,x63))
% 0.46/0.61  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x71),f2(x73,x72))
% 0.46/0.61  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83,x84),f4(x82,x83,x84))
% 0.46/0.61  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91,x94),f4(x93,x92,x94))
% 0.46/0.61  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x103,x104,x101),f4(x103,x104,x102))
% 0.46/0.61  [11]~P1(x111)+P1(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.46/0.61  [12]P2(x122,x123,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x121,x123,x124)
% 0.46/0.61  [13]P2(x133,x132,x134)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x133,x131,x134)
% 0.46/0.61  [14]P2(x143,x144,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x144,x141)
% 0.46/0.61  [15]~P3(x151)+P3(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.46/0.61  
% 0.46/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.46/0.61     (P2(x211,x211,a1)),
% 0.46/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,18,20])).
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.46/0.61     (P2(x231,x231,a1)),
% 0.46/0.61     inference(rename_variables,[],[21])).
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.46/0.61     (~E(f2(f6(f5(x241)),a1),f4(x241,f2(f6(f5(x241)),a1),a1))),
% 0.46/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,21,23,12,13])).
% 0.46/0.61  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.46/0.61     ($false),
% 0.46/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,16,2,19]),
% 0.46/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------