↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ANA009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:55:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.63s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  18 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  25   ~;  22   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   5 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  42   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X3,X0),c_plus(X2,X3,X0),X0)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,X0)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oadd__le__cancel__right_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_plus(X1,c_uminus(X1,X0),X0) = c_0
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oright__minus_0) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : c_lessequals(v_lb(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_plus(v_f(v_x),c_uminus(v_lb(v_x),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_37) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_4) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X3,X2),c_plus(X1,X3,X2),X2)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(X1,c_uminus(X1,X0),X0) = c_0 )
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(v_lb(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_plus(v_f(v_x),c_uminus(v_lb(v_x),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(X2,c_uminus(X2,X1),X1) = c_0 )
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0)
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_118,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(X1,c_uminus(X1,X0),X0) = c_0 )
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_117]) ).

tcf(c_128,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(X1,c_uminus(X1,X0),X0) = c_0 )
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_129,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_plus(X0,c_uminus(X0,t_b),t_b) = c_0,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_128]) ).

tcf(c_134,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X0)
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_135,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(t_b),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_134]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X3,X0),c_plus(X2,X3,X0),X0)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X1,X2,X0)
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_135]) ).

tcf(c_142,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X2,t_b),c_plus(X1,X2,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,t_b) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_141]) ).

tcf(c_172,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = v_f(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_173,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = v_lb(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_174,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_uminus(iPr_def_11,t_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_175,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_plus(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12,t_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_176,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X2,t_b),c_plus(X1,X2,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,t_b) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tcf(c_177,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_plus(X0,c_uminus(X0,t_b),t_b) = c_0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_129]) ).

tcf(c_178,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_0,iPr_def_13,t_b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_173,c_174,c_172,c_175]) ).

tcf(c_179,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(v_lb(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_314,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_0,c_plus(X1,c_uminus(X0,t_b),t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_177,c_176]) ).

tcf(c_340,plain,
    c_lessequals(v_lb(v_x),iPr_def_10,t_b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_179]) ).

tcf(c_341,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10,t_b),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_340,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_345,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_0,c_plus(X0,iPr_def_12,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,X0,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_174,c_314]) ).

tcf(c_381,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_0,iPr_def_13,t_b)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_175,c_345]) ).

tcf(c_383,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_381,c_178,c_341]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ANA009-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:46:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.41  % Proving...
% 1.63/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.63/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.63/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % 
% 1.63/1.26  % clauses                               8
% 1.63/1.26  % conjectures                           2
% 1.63/1.26  % EPR                                   1
% 1.63/1.26  % Horn                                  8
% 1.63/1.26  % unary                                 7
% 1.63/1.26  % binary                                1
% 1.63/1.26  % lits                                  9
% 1.63/1.26  % lits eq                               5
% 1.63/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.63/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.63/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.63/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.63/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.63/1.26  % Current options:
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.63/1.26  % 
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.63/1.26  
% 1.63/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------