↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ANA010-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:02:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   65 (   8 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1)
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(X1)),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1),c_HOL_Oabs(X3,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | c_lessequals(X4,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_0,v_f(X1),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_f(X1),c_times(v_c,v_g(X1),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(clsrel_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs_17,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs_17) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1)
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__of__nonneg_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(X1)),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1),c_HOL_Oabs(X3,X1),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X2,X1)
    | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1) = X2 ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(X1)),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X2,X3,X1),X1) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X2,X1),c_HOL_Oabs(X3,X1),X1) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    tfree_tcs ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X1,X2)
    | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X2)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | c_lessequals(X4,X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b))),c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X1,v_g(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b))),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,X1,t_b)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | c_lessequals(X4,X3,X1) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_0,v_f(X1),t_b),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(X1,v_g(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b))),t_b),t_b)
    | ~ c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b))),c_times(X1,v_g(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,t_b))),t_b),t_b) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_f(X1),c_times(v_c,v_g(X1),t_b),t_b),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(v_f(X2),X1,t_b)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b)
    | c_lessequals(c_0,X1,t_b) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(v_c,v_g(v_x(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_b))),t_b),t_b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b)
    | c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(v_c,v_g(X1),t_b),t_b) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)
    | class_Orderings_Oorder(X1) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_14]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ANA010-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:25:01 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.37  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.37  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.40  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 202817 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.40  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.40  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.40  % Search class: FHUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % SubtermCWHack with pid 202821 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.40  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.40  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.40  % Search class: FHUSS-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.40  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.40  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.40  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.40  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.13/0.40  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.13/0.40  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.13/0.40  % Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.13/0.40  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 0.13/0.40  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.13/0.40  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Generated clauses                    : 33
% 0.13/0.40  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
% 0.13/0.40  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Paramodulations                      : 33
% 0.13/0.40  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.13/0.40  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.13/0.40  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.40  % Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.13/0.40  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.13/0.40  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.40  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.13/0.40  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.13/0.40  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.13/0.40  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40
% 0.13/0.40  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.13/0.40  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12
% 0.13/0.40  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.13/0.40  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.13/0.40  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.40  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1016
% 0.13/0.40  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 20
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40  % User time                : 0.000 s
% 0.13/0.40  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.40  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.40  % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.40  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.40  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.40  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.13/0.40  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.40  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------