↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ANA012-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:27:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.09s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 1.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ANA012-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 03:40:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Fri Jul  8 03:40:37 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 27203.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.63/0.83  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.63/0.83  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.63/0.83  number of clauses in intial UL: 8
% 0.63/0.83  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.63/0.83  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.63/0.83  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.63/0.83  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.63/0.83  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.63/0.83     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.63/0.83     distinct function count: 3
% 0.63/0.83     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.63/0.83  
% 0.63/0.83  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.09/1.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.09/1.31  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Model 2 [ 2 0 168 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.92 sec ----> 156 [binary,154.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.09/1.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.09/1.31  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  1 [] {+} v_c!=c_0.
% 1.09/1.31  2 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_1,c_times(A,c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_a),t_a),t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  3 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(A)|c_HOL_Oabs(B,A)!=c_0|B=c_0.
% 1.09/1.31  4 [] {+} -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)|c_lessequals(B,B,A).
% 1.09/1.31  5 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|B=c_0|c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(B,A),B,A)=c_1.
% 1.09/1.31  6 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(A)|class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A).
% 1.09/1.31  7 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(A).
% 1.09/1.31  8 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(A)|class_Orderings_Oorder(A).
% 1.09/1.31  9 [] {-} class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  11 [hyper,9,8] {-} class_Orderings_Oorder(t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  12 [hyper,9,7] {+} class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  13 [hyper,9,6] {-} class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  16 [hyper,11,4] {-} c_lessequals(A,A,t_a).
% 1.09/1.31  21 [hyper,13,5] {+} A=c_0|c_times(c_HOL_Oinverse(A,t_a),A,t_a)=c_1.
% 1.09/1.31  145 [para_from,21.2.1,2.1.2,unit_del,16] {-} c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_a)=c_0.
% 1.09/1.31  154 [hyper,145,3,12] {-} v_c=c_0.
% 1.09/1.31  156 [binary,154.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.09/1.31  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  ============ end of search ============
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  true clauses given           7      (31.8%)
% 1.09/1.31  false clauses given         15
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.09/1.31     7  1         0
% 1.09/1.31     8  0         1
% 1.09/1.31    11  1         1
% 1.09/1.31    12  1         1
% 1.09/1.31    13  6         1
% 1.09/1.31    14  3         2
% 1.09/1.31    15  6         2
% 1.09/1.31    16  4         1
% 1.09/1.31    17  0         13
% 1.09/1.31    18  3         9
% 1.09/1.31    19  0         10
% 1.09/1.31    20  2         5
% 1.09/1.31    21  0         4
% 1.09/1.31    22  0         13
% 1.09/1.31    23  0         9
% 1.09/1.31    24  0         4
% 1.09/1.31    25  0         10
% 1.09/1.31    26  0         2
% 1.09/1.31    27  0         3
% 1.09/1.31  tot:  27        91      (77.1% true)
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Model 2 [ 2 -13 168 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.09/1.31  
% 1.09/1.31  Process 27203 finished Fri Jul  8 03:40:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------