↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ANA017-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:26:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.82s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (   4 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(X),t_b),c_times(v_ca,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(v_c,v_b(v_x(X)),t_b),t_b),c_times(X,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(X)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X)
    | c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(Y,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__ac__1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X)
    | c_times(c_times(Y,Z,X),U,X) = c_times(Y,c_times(Z,U,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__ac__1_0) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(Y,Z,X),X) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(Y,X),c_HOL_Oabs(Z,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring__class_Omult__left__mono_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(X)
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,Z,X)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_0,U,X)
    | c_lessequals(c_times(U,Y,X),c_times(U,Z,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring__class_Omult__left__mono_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_21,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_21) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_42,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_42) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_21,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_42,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X,Y,t_b),t_b) = c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(Y,t_b),t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Oabs__mult_0,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    c_times(c_times(X,Y,t_b),Z,t_b) = c_times(X,c_times(Y,Z,t_b),t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__ac__1_0,11]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_b),t_b),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,13]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X,v_b(Y),t_b),t_b),c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_b),c_times(v_ca,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(Y),t_b),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring__class_Omult__left__mono_0,16,12,cls_conjecture_0]),14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(490,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X,v_b(Y),t_b),t_b),c_times(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_b),v_ca,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(Y),t_b),t_b),t_b),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(660,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,490]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : ANA017-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 03:55:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T03:55:44
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-08T03:55:44
% 0.82/0.99  
% 0.82/0.99  
% 0.82/0.99  #||
% 0.82/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.82/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/0.99  ||#
% 0.82/0.99  
% 0.82/0.99  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.82/0.99  ;      1178 formulas have been input or derived (from 33 formulas).
% 0.82/0.99  ;       660 (56%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.82/0.99  ;            4 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.82/0.99  ;          656 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.82/0.99  ; 
% 0.82/0.99  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.002   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (10 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.079  15%   Process new row              (1,146 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.002   0%   Resolution                   (64 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.024   5%   Paramodulation               (32 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (7 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (7 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (7 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.118  22%   Forward simplification       (1,146 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.025   5%   Backward simplification      (660 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.247  47%   Ordering                     (32,037 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.027   5%   Other
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.526        Total
% 0.82/0.99  ;     0.528        Real time
% 0.82/0.99  ; 
% 0.82/0.99  ; Term-hash-array has 1,145 terms in all.
% 0.82/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7 entries (7 at peak, 7 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 27 nodes (27 at peak, 27 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 7 calls.
% 0.82/0.99  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 7 calls.
% 0.82/0.99  ; Path-index has 1,144 entries (1,144 at peak, 1,150 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ; Path-index has 2,864 nodes (2,864 at peak, 2,867 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ; Trie-index has 1,144 entries (1,144 at peak, 1,150 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ; Trie-index has 12,374 nodes (12,374 at peak, 12,441 added, 67 deleted).
% 0.82/0.99  ; Retrieved 13,021 generalization terms in 8,056 calls.
% 0.82/0.99  ; Retrieved 2,720 instance terms in 1,758 calls.
% 0.82/0.99  ; Retrieved 2,659 unifiable terms in 330 calls.
% 0.82/0.99  ; 
% 0.82/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to process has 13 entries:
% 0.82/0.99  ;     1 with value 31              1 with value 39               9 with value 44
% 0.82/0.99  ;     1 with value 37              1 with value 41
% 0.82/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to give has 623 entries:
% 0.82/0.99  ;     4 with value (4 30)         60 with value (4 36)         117 with value (4 42)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     2 with value (4 31)         20 with value (4 37)         236 with value (4 43)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     1 with value (4 32)         11 with value (4 38)         121 with value (4 44)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     3 with value (4 33)          3 with value (4 39)           5 with value (4 45)
% 0.82/0.99  ;     2 with value (4 34)          4 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 47)
% 0.82/0.99  ;    20 with value (4 35)         12 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 48)
% 0.82/0.99  Evaluation took:
% 0.82/0.99    0.528 seconds of real time
% 0.82/0.99    0.455816 seconds of user run time
% 0.82/0.99    0.072789 seconds of system run time
% 0.82/0.99    [Run times include 0.015 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.82/0.99    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.82/0.99    0 page faults and
% 0.82/0.99    33,072,520 bytes consed.
% 0.82/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.82/0.99  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T03:55:45
% 0.82/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.82/0.99  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------