↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ANA021-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:55:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.64s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  16 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  13   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   6 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = c_Suc(c_minus(X0,c_1,tc_nat))
      | ~ c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_NatBin_OSuc__pred_H_0) ).

fof(f2,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_Suc(c_minus(X0,c_1,tc_nat)) = X0
      | ~ c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = c_0
      | c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Onot__gr0_0) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_0 = X0
      | c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    v_x != c_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    c_0 != v_x,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(v_x),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( c_Suc(c_minus(X0,c_1,tc_nat)) = X0 )
      | ~ c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_less(c_0,X0,tc_nat)
      | ( X0 = c_0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    c_0 != v_x,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(v_x),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = c_0 )
      | ( c_Suc(c_minus(X1,c_1,tc_nat)) = X1 )
      | ( tc_nat != tc_nat )
      | ( c_0 != c_0 )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_108,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = c_0 )
      | ( c_Suc(c_minus(X0,c_1,tc_nat)) = X0 ) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_107]) ).

tcf(c_153,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = v_f(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_154,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_HOL_Oabs(iPr_def_10,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_155,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = v_h(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_156,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_HOL_Oabs(iPr_def_12,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_157,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_times(v_c,iPr_def_13,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,t_a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_155,c_156,c_157,c_153,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    c_0 != v_x,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

tcf(c_160,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(c_Suc(X0)),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_323,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X0),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(X0),t_a),t_a),t_a)
      | ( X0 = c_0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_160]) ).

tcf(c_332,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x),t_a),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(iPr_def_12,t_a),t_a),t_a)
    | ( c_0 = v_x ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_155,c_323]) ).

tcf(c_333,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14,t_a)
    | ( c_0 = v_x ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_153,c_154,c_156,c_157]) ).

tcf(c_334,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_158,c_159]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ANA021-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:46:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.41  % Proving...
% 1.64/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.64/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.64/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % 
% 1.64/1.26  % clauses                               9
% 1.64/1.26  % conjectures                           3
% 1.64/1.26  % EPR                                   2
% 1.64/1.26  % Horn                                  8
% 1.64/1.26  % unary                                 8
% 1.64/1.26  % binary                                1
% 1.64/1.26  % lits                                  10
% 1.64/1.26  % lits eq                               8
% 1.64/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.64/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.64/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.64/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.64/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.64/1.26  % Current options:
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.64/1.26  % 
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.26  
% 1.64/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------