↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ANA023-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:27:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ANA023-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 05:12:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Fri Jul  8 05:12:36 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13174.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.35  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.35  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 9
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 13
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 69
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.13/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.13/0.38     distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.13/0.38     distinct function count: 5
% 0.13/0.38     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 27 [binary,26.1,5.1] {+} $F.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Length of proof is 11.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  1 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(A)|c_plus(c_0,B,A)=B.
% 0.13/0.38  2 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(A)| -c_lessequals(B,c_minus(C,D,A),A)|c_lessequals(c_plus(B,D,A),C,A).
% 0.13/0.38  3 [] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(A)| -c_lessequals(c_plus(B,C,A),D,A)|c_lessequals(B,c_minus(D,C,A),A).
% 0.13/0.38  4 [] {+} -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)| -c_lessequals(B,C,A)| -c_lessequals(D,B,A)|c_lessequals(D,C,A).
% 0.13/0.38  5 [] {+} -c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  6 [] {+} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|class_Orderings_Oorder(A).
% 0.13/0.38  7 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(A).
% 0.13/0.38  8 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_Orderings_Olinorder(A).
% 0.13/0.38  9 [] {+} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(A).
% 0.13/0.38  10 [] {-} c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  11 [] {-} c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),v_f(v_x),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  12 [] {+} class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  14 [hyper,12,9] {+} class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  15 [hyper,12,8] {+} class_Orderings_Olinorder(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  16 [hyper,12,7] {+} class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  17 [hyper,14,2,10] {-} c_lessequals(c_plus(c_0,v_g(v_x),t_b),v_k(v_x),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  18 [hyper,15,6] {+} class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  19 [para_into,17.1.1,1.2.1] {-} c_lessequals(v_g(v_x),v_k(v_x),t_b)| -class_OrderedGroup_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  20 [hyper,16,19] {-} c_lessequals(v_g(v_x),v_k(v_x),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  21 [hyper,16,1] {+} c_plus(c_0,A,t_b)=A.
% 0.13/0.38  23 [hyper,18,4,11,20] {-} c_lessequals(v_g(v_x),v_f(v_x),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  24 [para_from,21.1.1,3.2.1] {+} -class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b)| -c_lessequals(A,B,t_b)|c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(B,A,t_b),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  26 [hyper,24,14,23] {-} c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b).
% 0.13/0.38  27 [binary,26.1,5.1] {+} $F.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.38  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  true clauses given           8      (57.1%)
% 0.13/0.38  false clauses given          6
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.13/0.38    13  0         1
% 0.13/0.38  tot:  0         1      (100.0% true)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Process 13174 finished Fri Jul  8 05:12:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------