↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : ANA024-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:55:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.99s 1.08s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  19 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  26   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   6 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  53   !;   0   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X1 = c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__10_0) ).

fof(f2,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0) = X1
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_minus(X3,X2,X0),X0)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,X0),X3,X0)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__9_1) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : c_lessequals(v_k(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add_0) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_54) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0) = X1 )
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_minus(X3,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X2)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,X2),X3,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(v_k(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0)
      | ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_118,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0)
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_118]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(c_minus(X2,X3,X1),X3,X1) = X2 )
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0)
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_125,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0) = X1 )
      | ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_124]) ).

tcf(c_135,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0) = X1 )
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_125,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_136,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_plus(c_minus(X0,X1,t_b),X1,t_b) = X0,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_135]) ).

tcf(c_141,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X1,c_minus(X3,X2,X0),X0)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,X0),X3,X0)
      | ( X0 != t_b ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_142,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_minus(X2,X1,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,t_b),X2,t_b) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_141]) ).

tcf(c_174,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = v_k(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_175,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = v_g(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_176,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_minus(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11,t_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_177,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = v_f(v_x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_178,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_minus(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11,t_b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_179,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(X0,c_minus(X2,X1,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X0,X1,t_b),X2,t_b) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_plus(c_minus(X0,X1,t_b),X1,t_b) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_136]) ).

tcf(c_181,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14,t_b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_177,c_178,c_175,c_174,c_176]) ).

tcf(c_182,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_lessequals(v_k(X0),v_f(X0),t_b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_331,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(c_minus(X0,X2,t_b),c_minus(X1,X2,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_180,c_179]) ).

tcf(c_339,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,v_f(v_x),t_b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_174,c_182]) ).

tcf(c_340,plain,
    c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,t_b),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_177]) ).

tcf(c_343,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,c_minus(X0,iPr_def_11,t_b),t_b)
      | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,X0,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_331]) ).

tcf(c_386,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14,t_b)
    | ~ c_lessequals(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13,t_b) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_343]) ).

tcf(c_387,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_181,c_340]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : ANA024-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.32  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.32  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 05:46:51 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.32  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.36  % Proving...
% 0.99/1.08  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.99/1.08  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.99/1.08  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Proving...
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % 
% 0.99/1.08  % clauses                               9
% 0.99/1.08  % conjectures                           2
% 0.99/1.08  % EPR                                   1
% 0.99/1.08  % Horn                                  9
% 0.99/1.08  % unary                                 8
% 0.99/1.08  % binary                                1
% 0.99/1.08  % lits                                  10
% 0.99/1.08  % lits eq                               6
% 0.99/1.08  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.99/1.08  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.99/1.08  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.99/1.08  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.99/1.08  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ 
% 0.99/1.08  % Current options:
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % ------ Proving...
% 0.99/1.08  % 
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.99/1.08  
% 0.99/1.08  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------