↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : ANA025-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:13:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : ANA025-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 04:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.46/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.46/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.050000s
% 0.46/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.050000s
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  % File     : ANA025-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.46/0.59  % Domain   : Analysis
% 0.46/0.59  % Problem  : Problem about Big-O notation
% 0.46/0.59  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.46/0.59  % English  :
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.46/0.59  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.46/0.59  % Names    :
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.59  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.1.0, 0.09 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.12 v4.0.1, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.46/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   3 unt;   1 nHn;  10 RR)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of literals    :   27 (   0 equ;  16 neg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.46/0.59  %            Number of variables   :   20 (   1 sgn)
% 0.46/0.59  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.46/0.59  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.46/0.59  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.46/0.59  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.46/0.59  %            axioms.
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(V_a,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_Orderings_Olinorder__not__le_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_less(V_y,V_x,T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_lessequals(V_x,V_y,T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_Orderings_Omin__max_Obelow__sup_Oabove__sup__conv_2,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_b)
% 0.46/0.59      | ~ c_lessequals(V_y,V_z,T_b)
% 0.46/0.59      | ~ c_lessequals(V_x,V_z,T_b)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Omax(V_x,V_y,T_b),V_z,T_b) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__class_Oorder__trans_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | ~ c_lessequals(V_y,V_z,T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | ~ c_lessequals(V_x,V_y,T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_lessequals(V_x,V_z,T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__less__imp__le_0,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | ~ c_less(V_x,V_y,T_a)
% 0.46/0.59      | c_lessequals(V_x,V_y,T_a) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.59      ~ c_lessequals(c_0,c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.59      ~ c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Omax(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),c_0,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(clsrel_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder_1,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder(T)
% 0.46/0.59      | class_Orderings_Oorder(T) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(clsrel_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs_15,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T)
% 0.46/0.59      | class_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder(T) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_33,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.46/0.59      | class_Orderings_Olinorder(T) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
% 0.46/0.59      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.46/0.59      | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T) ) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.59      class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b) ).
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.46/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.59  %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.46/0.59  %VarNum:48(SingletonVarNum:20)
% 0.46/0.59  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.46/0.59  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.46/0.59  %SharedTerms:13
% 0.46/0.59  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.46/0.59  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.46/0.59  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.46/0.59  [2]~P2(a2,f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1)
% 0.46/0.59  [3]~P2(f4(f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),a2,a1),f5(f3(f9(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1),a1)
% 0.46/0.59  [4]~P1(x41)+P4(x41)
% 0.46/0.59  [5]~P1(x51)+P6(x51)
% 0.46/0.59  [6]~P5(x61)+P7(x61)
% 0.46/0.59  [7]~P4(x71)+P5(x71)
% 0.46/0.59  [8]~P4(x82)+P2(a2,f5(x81,x82),x82)
% 0.46/0.59  [9]P3(x92,x91,x93)+~P6(x93)+P2(x91,x92,x93)
% 0.46/0.59  [10]~P7(x103)+~P3(x101,x102,x103)+P2(x101,x102,x103)
% 0.46/0.59  [11]~P7(x113)+~P2(x114,x112,x113)+P2(x111,x112,x113)+~P2(x111,x114,x113)
% 0.46/0.59  [12]~P6(x123)+~P2(x121,x124,x123)+~P2(x122,x124,x123)+P2(f4(x121,x122,x123),x124,x123)
% 0.46/0.59  %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.59  
% 0.46/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P2(f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),f5(f3(f9(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1),a1)+~P6(a1)+~P2(a2,f5(f3(f9(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1),a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,12])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (P5(a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,7])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(73,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (P2(a2,f5(x731,a1),a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,8,4])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P2(f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),f5(f3(f9(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1),a1)+~P6(a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[73,27])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(75,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P7(a1)+~P2(f5(x751,a1),f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,73,11])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(81,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P7(a1)+~P3(f5(x811,a1),f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,10])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(82,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P6(a1)+P2(f3(f7(a6),f8(a6),a1),f5(x821,a1),a1)+~P7(a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[81,9])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(83,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P6(a1)+~P7(a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,82])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(84,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     (~P7(a1)),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,83,5])).
% 0.46/0.60  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.46/0.60     ($false),
% 0.46/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,41,6]),
% 0.46/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.60  % Total time :0.050000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------