↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : ANA031-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:13:58 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 79.91s 80.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 79.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : ANA031-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 04:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.50/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 79.91/80.16  %-------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.16  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 79.91/80.16  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 79.91/80.16  % Transform   :cnf
% 79.91/80.16  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 79.91/80.16  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 79.91/80.16  
% 79.91/80.16  % Result      :Theorem 79.330000s
% 79.91/80.16  % Output      :CNFRefutation 79.330000s
% 79.91/80.16  %-------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.18  % File     : ANA031-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 79.91/80.18  % Domain   : Analysis
% 79.91/80.18  % Problem  : Problem about Big-O notation
% 79.91/80.18  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 79.91/80.18  % English  :
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 79.91/80.18  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 79.91/80.18  % Names    :
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 79.91/80.18  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.17 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.22 v5.5.0, 0.44 v5.4.0, 0.47 v5.3.0, 0.58 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.29 v4.1.0, 0.33 v3.3.0, 0.43 v3.2.0
% 79.91/80.18  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Number of literals    :   21 (   2 equ;  11 neg)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
% 79.91/80.18  %            Number of variables   :   19 (   1 sgn)
% 79.91/80.18  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 79.91/80.18  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 79.91/80.18  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 79.91/80.18  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 79.91/80.18  %            axioms.
% 79.91/80.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 79.91/80.18      c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(V_U),t_b),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(V_U),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 79.91/80.18      ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_b(v_x(V_U)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),t_b),c_times(V_U,c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(V_U)),t_b),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(V_a,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__ac__1_0,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | c_times(c_times(V_a,V_b,T_a),V_c,T_a) = c_times(V_a,c_times(V_b,V_c,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__ac__2_0,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | c_times(V_a,V_b,T_a) = c_times(V_b,V_a,T_a) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring__class_Omult__left__mono_0,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | ~ c_lessequals(V_a,V_b,T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | ~ c_lessequals(c_0,V_c,T_a)
% 79.91/80.18      | c_lessequals(c_times(V_c,V_a,T_a),c_times(V_c,V_b,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_17,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 79.91/80.18      | class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(T) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_21,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 79.91/80.18      | class_OrderedGroup_Osemigroup__mult(T) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_42,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 79.91/80.18      | class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(T) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
% 79.91/80.18      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 79.91/80.18      | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T) ) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
% 79.91/80.18      class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b) ).
% 79.91/80.18  
% 79.91/80.18  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.18  %-------------------------------------------
% 79.91/80.18  % Proof found
% 79.91/80.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 79.91/80.18  % SZS output start Proof
% 79.91/80.19  %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:20)
% 79.91/80.19  %VarNum:50(SingletonVarNum:19)
% 79.91/80.19  %MaxLitNum:4
% 79.91/80.19  %MaxfuncDepth:5
% 79.91/80.19  %SharedTerms:4
% 79.91/80.19  %goalClause: 21 22 23
% 79.91/80.19  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 79.91/80.19  [21]P1(a1)
% 79.91/80.19  [22]P2(f2(f5(x221),a1),f4(a6,f2(f7(x221),a1),a1),a1)
% 79.91/80.19  [23]~P2(f4(f2(f5(f9(x231)),a1),f2(f8(f9(x231)),a1),a1),f4(x231,f4(f2(f8(f9(x231)),a1),f2(f7(f9(x231)),a1),a1),a1),a1)
% 79.91/80.19  [24]~P1(x241)+P3(x241)
% 79.91/80.19  [25]~P1(x251)+P5(x251)
% 79.91/80.19  [26]~P1(x261)+P4(x261)
% 79.91/80.19  [27]~P1(x271)+P6(x271)
% 79.91/80.19  [28]~P3(x282)+P2(a3,f2(x281,x282),x282)
% 79.91/80.19  [29]~P4(x293)+E(f4(x291,x292,x293),f4(x292,x291,x293))
% 79.91/80.19  [30]~P5(x303)+E(f4(f4(x301,x302,x303),x304,x303),f4(x301,f4(x302,x304,x303),x303))
% 79.91/80.19  [31]~P6(x313)+~P2(x312,x314,x313)+~P2(a3,x311,x313)+P2(f4(x311,x312,x313),f4(x311,x314,x313),x313)
% 79.91/80.19  %EqnAxiom
% 79.91/80.19  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 79.91/80.19  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 79.91/80.19  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 79.91/80.19  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 79.91/80.19  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51,x53),f2(x52,x53))
% 79.91/80.19  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x63,x61),f2(x63,x62))
% 79.91/80.19  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72))
% 79.91/80.19  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83,x84),f4(x82,x83,x84))
% 79.91/80.19  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91,x94),f4(x93,x92,x94))
% 79.91/80.19  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x103,x104,x101),f4(x103,x104,x102))
% 79.91/80.19  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f9(x111),f9(x112))
% 79.91/80.19  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f8(x121),f8(x122))
% 79.91/80.19  [13]~P1(x131)+P1(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 79.91/80.19  [14]P2(x142,x143,x144)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x141,x143,x144)
% 79.91/80.19  [15]P2(x153,x152,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P2(x153,x151,x154)
% 79.91/80.19  [16]P2(x163,x164,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P2(x163,x164,x161)
% 79.91/80.19  [17]~P5(x171)+P5(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 79.91/80.19  [18]~P3(x181)+P3(x182)+~E(x181,x182)
% 79.91/80.19  [19]~P4(x191)+P4(x192)+~E(x191,x192)
% 79.91/80.19  [20]~P6(x201)+P6(x202)+~E(x201,x202)
% 79.91/80.19  
% 79.91/80.19  %-------------------------------------------
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(41,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(a3,f2(x411,a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,24,28])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(46,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(f4(x461,x462,a1),x463,a1),f4(x461,f4(x462,x463,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,25,30])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(47,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x471,f4(x472,x473,a1),a1),f4(f4(x471,x472,a1),x473,a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(163,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x1631,x1632,a1),f4(x1632,x1631,a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,29,26])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(164,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(f2(f5(x1641),a1),f4(f2(f7(x1641),a1),a6,a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,163,15])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(286,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x2861,f4(x2862,x2863,a1),a1),f4(x2862,f4(x2863,x2861,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[163,46,3])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(289,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x2891,f4(x2892,x2893,a1),a1),f4(x2893,f4(x2891,x2892,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[163,46,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(299,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(f4(x2991,x2992,a1),x2993,a1),f4(f4(x2992,x2993,a1),x2991,a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[163,47,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(572,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x5721,f4(f4(x5722,x5723,a1),x5724,a1),a1),f4(x5722,f4(x5723,f4(x5724,x5721,a1),a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[286,46,3])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(575,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x5751,f4(x5752,f4(x5753,x5754,a1),a1),a1),f4(x5754,f4(f4(x5751,x5752,a1),x5753,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[286,46,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(626,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x6261,f4(x6262,f4(x6263,x6264,a1),a1),a1),f4(x6263,f4(x6264,f4(x6261,x6262,a1),a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[286,572,3])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(1304,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x13041,f4(x13042,x13043,a1),a1),f4(f4(x13043,x13041,a1),x13042,a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[289,47,3])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(1306,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(f4(x13061,x13062,a1),x13063,a1),f4(x13062,f4(x13063,x13061,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[289,47,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(4016,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x40161,f4(f4(x40162,f4(x40163,x40164,a1),a1),x40165,a1),a1),f4(x40164,f4(f4(f4(x40165,x40161,a1),x40162,a1),x40163,a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[572,1306,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6029,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x60291,f4(x60292,f4(x60293,f4(x60294,x60295,a1),a1),a1),a1),f4(x60294,f4(x60295,f4(f4(x60291,x60292,a1),x60293,a1),a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[575,46,3])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6032,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x60321,f4(x60322,f4(f4(x60323,x60324,a1),x60325,a1),a1),a1),f4(x60323,f4(x60324,f4(x60325,f4(x60321,x60322,a1),a1),a1),a1))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[575,46,3,2])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6810,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P6(a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,4016,4,7,11,12,5,6,8,10,9,24,27])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6816,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (~P2(f4(f2(f8(f9(x68161)),a1),f2(f5(f9(x68161)),a1),a1),f4(x68161,f4(f2(f8(f9(x68161)),a1),f2(f7(f9(x68161)),a1),a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,4016,23,163,4,7,11,12,5,6,8,10,9,24,27,26,25,14])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6818,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(f4(f2(x68181,a1),a3,a1),f4(f2(x68181,a1),f2(x68181,a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,4016,23,163,41,4,7,11,12,5,6,8,10,9,24,27,26,25,14,31])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6836,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(f4(f2(x68361,a1),f4(f2(x68362,a1),a3,a1),a1),f4(f2(x68361,a1),f4(f2(x68362,a1),f2(x68362,a1),a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[6810,6818,6029,41,4,6,12,11,5,7,8,10,9,31])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6850,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(f4(f2(x68501,a1),f2(f5(x68502),a1),a1),f4(f2(x68501,a1),f4(f2(f7(x68502),a1),a6,a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[164,6810,6032,41,4,7,6,11,12,5,8,10,9,31])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6894,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(f4(f4(x68941,x68942,a1),x68943,a1),x68944,x68945),f4(f4(f4(x68942,x68943,a1),x68941,a1),x68944,x68945))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[299,4,11,6,12,7,5,9,10,8])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(6937,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (P2(f4(f4(a3,f2(x69371,a1),a1),f2(x69372,a1),a1),f4(f2(x69371,a1),f4(f2(x69372,a1),f2(x69372,a1),a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[6894,6836,1304,4,11,6,12,5,7,9,10,8,14])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(8018,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f9(f4(x80181,f4(x80182,f4(x80183,x80184,a1),a1),a1)),f9(f4(x80183,f4(x80184,f4(x80181,x80182,a1),a1),a1)))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[626,5,6,11])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(8072,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(f4(f4(x80721,x80722,a1),x80723,a1),x80724,x80725),f4(f4(x80721,f4(x80722,x80723,a1),a1),x80724,x80725))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,8])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(8074,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (E(f4(x80741,f4(f4(x80742,x80743,a1),x80744,a1),x80745),f4(x80741,f4(x80742,f4(x80743,x80744,a1),a1),x80745))),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,8,7,9])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(8081,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     (~P2(f4(f2(f8(f9(x80811)),a1),f2(f5(f9(x80811)),a1),a1),f4(f4(x80811,f2(f8(f9(x80811)),a1),a1),f2(f7(f9(x80811)),a1),a1),a1)),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,8018,6816,8,7,9,5,6,11,10,4,12,15])).
% 79.97/80.22  cnf(8101,plain,
% 79.97/80.22     ($false),
% 79.97/80.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,6937,8072,8074,6850,8081,1304,8,7,9,5,6,11,10,4,12,14,15]),
% 79.97/80.22     ['proof']).
% 79.97/80.23  % SZS output end Proof
% 79.97/80.23  % Total time :79.330000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------