%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ANA041-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:02:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 15.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(v_xa,v_xb),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(v_xa,v_xb),t_c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(v_xa,v_xb),t_c),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_0,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : ANA041-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/15.70 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/15.70 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/15.70 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:25:36 UTC 2026
% 0.16/15.70 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/15.70 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/15.75 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/15.76 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/15.94 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.58/15.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/15.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % new_bool_1 with pid 858717 completed with status 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.58/15.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/15.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.58/15.94 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/15.94 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/15.94 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % SubtermCWHack with pid 858720 completed with status 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.58/15.94 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/15.94 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.58/15.94 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/15.94 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/15.94 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/15.94 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.58/15.94 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.58/15.94
% 0.58/15.94 % Proof found!
% 0.58/15.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/15.94 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/15.94 % Parsed axioms : 2787
% 0.58/15.94 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1668
% 0.58/15.94 % Initial clauses : 1119
% 0.58/15.94 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1119
% 0.58/15.94 % Processed clauses : 716
% 0.58/15.94 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.58/15.94 % ...subsumed : 276
% 0.58/15.94 % ...remaining for further processing : 436
% 0.58/15.94 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.58/15.94 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.58/15.94 % Generated clauses : 411
% 0.58/15.94 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 325
% 0.58/15.94 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Paramodulations : 409
% 0.58/15.94 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % NegExts : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.58/15.94 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Total rewrite steps : 95
% 0.58/15.94 % ...of those cached : 55
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/15.94 % Current number of processed clauses : 432
% 0.58/15.94 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 93
% 0.58/15.94 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.58/15.94 % Non-unit-clauses : 325
% 0.58/15.94 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 728
% 0.58/15.94 % ...number of literals in the above : 2282
% 0.58/15.94 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.58/15.94 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 74911
% 0.58/15.94 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74880
% 0.58/15.94 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 271
% 0.58/15.94 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 0.58/15.94 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % BW rewrite match attempts : 40
% 0.58/15.94 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.58/15.94 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.58/15.94 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52411
% 0.58/15.94 % Search garbage collected termcells : 6563
% 0.58/15.94
% 0.58/15.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/15.94 % User time : 0.086 s
% 0.58/15.94 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.58/15.94 % Total time : 0.103 s
% 0.58/15.94 % Maximum resident set size: 6968 pages
% 0.58/15.94
% 0.58/15.94 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/15.94 % User time : 0.136 s
% 0.58/15.94 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.58/15.94 % Total time : 0.161 s
% 0.58/15.94 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.58/15.94 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------