%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ANA042-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:02:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ANA042-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:29:07 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.53/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1563650 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.53/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.53/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.53/0.64 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.64 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1563664 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.53/0.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.53/0.64 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.53/0.64 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.64 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % Proof found!
% 0.53/0.64 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.64 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.64 % Parsed axioms : 2787
% 0.53/0.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Initial clauses : 2787
% 0.53/0.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 9
% 0.53/0.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2778
% 0.53/0.64 % Processed clauses : 1396
% 0.53/0.64 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.53/0.64 % ...subsumed : 31
% 0.53/0.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 1355
% 0.53/0.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.53/0.64 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.53/0.64 % Generated clauses : 3606
% 0.53/0.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2833
% 0.53/0.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Paramodulations : 3604
% 0.53/0.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.53/0.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Total rewrite steps : 837
% 0.53/0.64 % ...of those cached : 696
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.53/0.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 1345
% 0.53/0.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 265
% 0.53/0.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.53/0.64 % Negative unit clauses : 22
% 0.53/0.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 1057
% 0.53/0.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4215
% 0.53/0.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 9129
% 0.53/0.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.53/0.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 324141
% 0.53/0.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 320581
% 0.53/0.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 22
% 0.53/0.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4127
% 0.53/0.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 65
% 0.53/0.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.53/0.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.53/0.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 98273
% 0.53/0.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4067
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 % User time : 0.126 s
% 0.53/0.64 % System time : 0.022 s
% 0.53/0.64 % Total time : 0.147 s
% 0.53/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 8248 pages
% 0.53/0.64
% 0.53/0.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64 % User time : 0.476 s
% 0.53/0.64 % System time : 0.072 s
% 0.53/0.64 % Total time : 0.548 s
% 0.53/0.64 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.53/0.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------