↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : ANA043-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:14:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : ANA043-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 04:55:09 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.49/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.64  
% 0.53/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.53/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.53/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % File     : ANA043-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.53/0.65  % Domain   : Analysis
% 0.53/0.65  % Problem  : Problem about Big-O notation
% 0.53/0.65  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.53/0.65  % English  :
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.65  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.53/0.65  % Names    :
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.65  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.29 v3.2.0
% 0.53/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of literals    :   17 (   1 equ;   9 neg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.53/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   15 (   1 sgn)
% 0.53/0.65  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.53/0.65  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.53/0.65  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.53/0.65  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.53/0.65  %            axioms.
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.65      c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(V_U),t_b),c_times(v_c,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(V_U),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.65      ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_l(v_x(V_U),v_xa(V_U)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_k(v_x(V_U),v_xa(V_U))),t_b),t_b),c_times(V_U,c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_l(v_x(V_U),v_xa(V_U)),t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(v_k(v_x(V_U),v_xa(V_U))),t_b),t_b),t_b),t_b) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
% 0.53/0.65      class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T_a)
% 0.53/0.65      | c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(V_a,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Omult__left__commute_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(T_a)
% 0.53/0.65      | c_times(V_a,c_times(V_b,V_c,T_a),T_a) = c_times(V_b,c_times(V_a,V_c,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring__class_Omult__left__mono_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(T_a)
% 0.53/0.65      | ~ c_lessequals(V_a,V_b,T_a)
% 0.53/0.65      | ~ c_lessequals(c_0,V_c,T_a)
% 0.53/0.65      | c_lessequals(c_times(V_c,V_a,T_a),c_times(V_c,V_b,T_a),T_a) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_17,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.53/0.65      | class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__mult(T) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_42,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.53/0.65      | class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__semiring(T) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
% 0.53/0.65      ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
% 0.53/0.65      | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(T) ) ).
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.65  %ClaNum:32(EqnAxiom:23)
% 0.53/0.65  %VarNum:45(SingletonVarNum:15)
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.53/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:6
% 0.53/0.65  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.53/0.65  %goalClause: 24 25 26
% 0.53/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.53/0.65  [24]P1(a1)
% 0.53/0.65  [25]P2(f2(f5(x251),a1),f4(a6,f2(f7(x251),a1),a1),a1)
% 0.53/0.65  [26]~P2(f4(f2(f9(f8(x261),f11(x261)),a1),f2(f5(f10(f8(x261),f11(x261))),a1),a1),f4(x261,f4(f2(f9(f8(x261),f11(x261)),a1),f2(f7(f10(f8(x261),f11(x261))),a1),a1),a1),a1)
% 0.53/0.65  [27]~P1(x271)+P3(x271)
% 0.53/0.65  [28]~P1(x281)+P4(x281)
% 0.53/0.65  [29]~P1(x291)+P5(x291)
% 0.53/0.65  [30]~P3(x302)+P2(a3,f2(x301,x302),x302)
% 0.53/0.65  [31]~P4(x314)+E(f4(x311,f4(x312,x313,x314),x314),f4(x312,f4(x311,x313,x314),x314))
% 0.53/0.65  [32]~P5(x323)+~P2(x322,x324,x323)+~P2(a3,x321,x323)+P2(f4(x321,x322,x323),f4(x321,x324,x323),x323)
% 0.53/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.65  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.53/0.65  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.53/0.65  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.53/0.65  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.53/0.65  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x51,x53),f2(x52,x53))
% 0.53/0.65  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x63,x61),f2(x63,x62))
% 0.53/0.65  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72))
% 0.53/0.65  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83,x84),f4(x82,x83,x84))
% 0.53/0.65  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91,x94),f4(x93,x92,x94))
% 0.53/0.65  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x103,x104,x101),f4(x103,x104,x102))
% 0.53/0.65  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f10(x111,x113),f10(x112,x113))
% 0.53/0.65  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f10(x123,x121),f10(x123,x122))
% 0.53/0.65  [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f8(x131),f8(x132))
% 0.53/0.65  [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f11(x141),f11(x142))
% 0.53/0.65  [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f9(x151,x153),f9(x152,x153))
% 0.53/0.65  [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f9(x163,x161),f9(x163,x162))
% 0.53/0.65  [17]~P1(x171)+P1(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 0.53/0.65  [18]P2(x182,x183,x184)+~E(x181,x182)+~P2(x181,x183,x184)
% 0.53/0.65  [19]P2(x193,x192,x194)+~E(x191,x192)+~P2(x193,x191,x194)
% 0.53/0.65  [20]P2(x203,x204,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P2(x203,x204,x201)
% 0.53/0.65  [21]~P4(x211)+P4(x212)+~E(x211,x212)
% 0.53/0.65  [22]~P3(x221)+P3(x222)+~E(x221,x222)
% 0.53/0.65  [23]~P5(x231)+P5(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.53/0.65  
% 0.53/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (P2(a3,f2(x391,a1),a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,27,30])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (E(f4(x461,f4(x462,x463,a1),a1),f4(x462,f4(x461,x463,a1),a1))),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,28,31])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     (P2(f4(f2(x511,a1),f2(f5(x512),a1),a1),f4(f2(x511,a1),f4(a6,f2(f7(x512),a1),a1),a1),a1)),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,39,25,29,32])).
% 0.53/0.66  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.53/0.66     ($false),
% 0.53/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,46,51,19]),
% 0.53/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.53/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.53/0.66  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------