↑ Up

SPASS+T---2.2.22.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : ANA140_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 22 15:23:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.76s 1.03s
% Output   : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : ANA140_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon May 22 10:59:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  % Using real theory
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_31453_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS.
% 0.76/1.03  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_31453_n008.cluster.edu 
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS derived 231 clauses, backtracked 23 clauses and kept 154 clauses.
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS backtracked 3 times (0 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS allocated 6443 KBytes.
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS spent	0:00:00.03 on the problem.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.76/1.03  		0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.76/1.03  		
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_31453_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  % Here is a proof with depth 4, length 24 :
% 0.76/1.03  2[0:Inp] ||  -> less(0,skc1)*.
% 0.76/1.03  4[0:Inp] || less(0,U) -> SkP0(U,skf1(U))*.
% 0.76/1.03  5[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(U,V)* greatereq(minus(V,a),0)*.
% 0.76/1.03  8[0:Inp] || greatereq(minus(skf1(U),a),0) SkP0(skc1,skf1(U))* less(0,U) -> .
% 0.76/1.03  9[0:Inp] || less(uminus(minus(skf1(U),a)),skc1)* SkP0(skc1,skf1(U)) less(0,U) -> .
% 0.76/1.03  10[0:Inp] || less(0,U) -> less(uminus(minus(skf1(U),a)),U)* greatereq(minus(skf1(U),a),0).
% 0.76/1.03  38[0:ArS:5.1] ||  -> SkP0(U,V)* lesseq(0,plus(V,uminus(a)))*.
% 0.76/1.03  39[0:TOC:4.0] ||  -> lesseq(U,0) SkP0(U,skf1(U))*.
% 0.76/1.03  44[0:ArS:8.0] || lesseq(0,plus(skf1(U),uminus(a)))* SkP0(skc1,skf1(U)) less(0,U) -> .
% 0.76/1.03  45[0:TOC:44.2] || SkP0(skc1,skf1(U)) -> lesseq(U,0) less(plus(skf1(U),uminus(a)),0)*.
% 0.76/1.03  46[0:ArS:10.2] || less(0,U) -> less(uminus(plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))),U)* lesseq(0,plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))).
% 0.76/1.03  47[0:TOC:46.0] ||  -> lesseq(U,0) lesseq(0,plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))) less(uminus(plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))),U)*.
% 0.76/1.03  48[0:ArS:9.0] || less(uminus(plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))),skc1)* SkP0(skc1,skf1(U)) less(0,U) -> .
% 0.76/1.03  49[0:TOC:48.2] || SkP0(skc1,skf1(U)) -> lesseq(U,0) lesseq(skc1,uminus(plus(skf1(U),uminus(a))))*.
% 0.76/1.03  198[0:OCE:47.2,49.2] || SkP0(skc1,skf1(skc1)) -> lesseq(skc1,0) lesseq(0,plus(skf1(skc1),uminus(a)))* lesseq(skc1,0).
% 0.76/1.03  202[0:Obv:198.1] || SkP0(skc1,skf1(skc1)) -> lesseq(0,plus(skf1(skc1),uminus(a)))* lesseq(skc1,0).
% 0.76/1.03  203(e)[0:MRR:202.0,38.0] ||  -> lesseq(0,plus(skf1(skc1),uminus(a)))* lesseq(skc1,0).
% 0.76/1.03  304(e)[1:Spt:203.0] ||  -> lesseq(0,plus(skf1(skc1),uminus(a)))*.
% 0.76/1.03  308[1:OCE:304.0,45.2] || SkP0(skc1,skf1(skc1))* -> lesseq(skc1,0).
% 0.76/1.03  312[1:MRR:308.0,39.1] ||  -> lesseq(skc1,0)*.
% 0.76/1.03  364(e)[1:OCE:312.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.76/1.03  369[1:Spt:364.0,203.0,304.0] || lesseq(0,plus(skf1(skc1),uminus(a)))* -> .
% 0.76/1.03  370[1:Spt:364.0,203.1] ||  -> lesseq(skc1,0)*.
% 0.76/1.03  373(e)[1:OCE:370.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_31453_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  Formulae used in the proof : fof_a fof_formula_1
% 0.76/1.03  
% 0.76/1.03  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------