↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : ARI082_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:34:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   5   ~;   0   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   77 (   0 atm;  22 fun;  39 num;  16 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (   4 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   8   !;   8   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: $int ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sK2: $int ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sK3: $int ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( ( ( $sum(2,3) = X0 )
        & ( $sum(X0,6) = X1 )
        & ( $sum(3,6) = X2 )
        & ( $sum(2,X2) = X3 ) )
     => ( X1 = X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associative_sum) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
        ( ( ( $sum(2,3) = X0 )
          & ( $sum(X0,6) = X1 )
          & ( $sum(3,6) = X2 )
          & ( $sum(2,X2) = X3 ) )
       => ( X1 = X3 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( ( X1 != X3 )
      & ( $sum(2,3) = X0 )
      & ( $sum(X0,6) = X1 )
      & ( $sum(3,6) = X2 )
      & ( $sum(2,X2) = X3 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ? [X0: $int,X1: $int,X2: $int,X3: $int] :
      ( ( X1 != X3 )
      & ( $sum(2,3) = X0 )
      & ( $sum(X0,6) = X1 )
      & ( $sum(3,6) = X2 )
      & ( $sum(2,X2) = X3 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    sK3 = $sum(2,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    $sum(3,6) = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    sK1 = $sum(sK0,6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    $sum(2,3) = sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    sK1 != sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    sK2 = 9,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    sK0 = 5,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    sK3 = $sum(2,9),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f22]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    sK3 = 11,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    sK1 != 11,
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f25]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    sK1 = $sum(5,6),
    inference(superposition,[],[f19,f23]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    sK1 = 11,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f27]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ARI082_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 20:42:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746562)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2622987620:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3746562-3746571"...
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746568)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746571)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.26  % (3746562)Success in time 0.034 s
% 0.19/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------