↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI188_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.57s 1.07s
% Output   : Proof 3.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : ARI188_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 17:51:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.60  
% 0.21/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.60  
% 0.21/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.60  
% 0.21/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.60  
% 0.21/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.65/0.94  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 1.65/0.94  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/0.98  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/0.98  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/0.98  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/0.98  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.21/0.98  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 2.38/1.01  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 2.38/1.02  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.57/1.07  Prover 3: proved (451ms)
% 2.57/1.07  
% 2.57/1.07  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.57/1.07  
% 2.57/1.07  Prover 6: stopped
% 2.57/1.08  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 2.57/1.08  Prover 2: proved (457ms)
% 2.57/1.08  Prover 5: proved (454ms)
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.08  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.08  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.08  Prover 0: proved (457ms)
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.08  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.57/1.08  
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 4: Found proof (size 5)
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 1: Found proof (size 5)
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 4: proved (464ms)
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 1: proved (465ms)
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 7: stopped
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 2.57/1.09  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 2.57/1.10  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 2.57/1.10  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.57/1.10  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.57/1.10  Prover 10: stopped
% 2.57/1.10  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.08/1.10  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.08/1.10  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.08/1.10  Prover 13: stopped
% 3.08/1.11  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.08/1.11  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.08/1.11  Prover 8: stopped
% 3.08/1.11  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.08/1.11  Prover 11: stopped
% 3.08/1.11  
% 3.08/1.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.08/1.11  
% 3.08/1.12  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.08/1.12  Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.08/1.12  ---------------------------------
% 3.08/1.12  
% 3.08/1.12    (co1)
% 3.08/1.16     ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & p(5) = v0 &  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 =
% 3.08/1.16        0 |  ~ (p($sum(v1, 3)) = v2)))
% 3.08/1.16  
% 3.08/1.16  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.08/1.16  ---------------------------------
% 3.08/1.16  
% 3.08/1.16  Begin of proof
% 3.08/1.16  | 
% 3.08/1.16  | DELTA: instantiating (co1) with fresh symbol all_3_0 gives:
% 3.08/1.17  |   (1)   ~ (all_3_0 = 0) & p(5) = all_3_0 &  ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 =
% 3.08/1.17  |          0 |  ~ (p($sum(v0, 3)) = v1))
% 3.08/1.17  | 
% 3.08/1.17  | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.08/1.17  |   (2)   ~ (all_3_0 = 0)
% 3.08/1.17  |   (3)  p(5) = all_3_0
% 3.08/1.17  |   (4)   ! [v0: int] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (p($sum(v0, 3)) = v1))
% 3.08/1.17  | 
% 3.08/1.17  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 2, all_3_0, simplifying with (3) gives:
% 3.08/1.17  |   (5)  all_3_0 = 0
% 3.08/1.17  | 
% 3.08/1.17  | REDUCE: (2), (5) imply:
% 3.08/1.17  |   (6)  $false
% 3.36/1.17  | 
% 3.36/1.17  | CLOSE: (6) is inconsistent.
% 3.36/1.17  | 
% 3.36/1.17  End of proof
% 3.36/1.17  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.36/1.17  
% 3.36/1.17  575ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------