%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : ARI205_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:16 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 6.22s 1.62s % Output : Proof 9.85s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ARI205_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:33:37 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.62 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 1.66/0.97 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.66/0.97 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.07/1.04 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.07/1.04 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.56/1.09 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.56/1.09 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.08/1.18 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.08/1.19 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.08/1.20 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 5.76/1.53 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.22/1.56 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.22/1.61 Prover 6: proved (961ms) % 6.22/1.61 % 6.22/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.22/1.62 % 6.22/1.63 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.22/1.63 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 6.22/1.63 Prover 0: stopped % 6.22/1.63 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 6.22/1.63 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 6.22/1.64 Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 6.22/1.64 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 6.22/1.66 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.94/1.67 Prover 2: stopped % 6.94/1.67 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 6.94/1.68 Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 6.94/1.68 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 7.19/1.72 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 8.01/1.81 Prover 1: Found proof (size 4) % 8.01/1.81 Prover 1: proved (1172ms) % 8.01/1.81 Prover 4: stopped % 8.01/1.83 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.01/1.84 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.01/1.86 Prover 8: stopped % 8.46/1.95 Prover 7: stopped % 8.46/1.99 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.46/2.00 Prover 5: stopped % 8.46/2.00 Prover 10: stopped % 9.68/2.06 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.68/2.06 Prover 3: stopped % 9.68/2.06 % 9.68/2.06 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 9.68/2.06 % 9.68/2.06 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 9.68/2.07 Assumptions after simplification: % 9.68/2.07 --------------------------------- % 9.68/2.07 % 9.68/2.07 (rat_lesseq_problem_3) % 9.85/2.09 rat_$lesseq(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = 0 % 9.85/2.09 % 9.85/2.09 (input) % 9.85/2.11 ~ (rat_very_large = rat_very_small) & ~ (rat_very_large = rat_1/4) & ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_very_large = rat_5/12) & ~ (rat_very_large = rat_0) & ~ (rat_very_small % 9.85/2.11 = rat_1/4) & ~ (rat_very_small = rat_5/12) & ~ (rat_very_small = rat_0) & % 9.85/2.11 ~ (rat_1/4 = rat_5/12) & ~ (rat_1/4 = rat_0) & ~ (rat_5/12 = rat_0) & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$is_int(rat_1/4) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_5/12) = 1 & rat_$is_int(rat_0) = 0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$is_rat(rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_5/12) = 0 & rat_$is_rat(rat_0) = % 9.85/2.11 0 & rat_$floor(rat_1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$floor(rat_5/12) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$floor(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$ceiling(rat_0) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$truncate(rat_1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$truncate(rat_5/12) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$truncate(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$round(rat_1/4) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$round(rat_5/12) = rat_0 & rat_$round(rat_0) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$to_int(rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$to_int(rat_5/12) = 0 & rat_$to_int(rat_0) = 0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$to_rat(rat_1/4) = rat_1/4 & rat_$to_rat(rat_5/12) = rat_5/12 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$to_rat(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$to_real(rat_1/4) = real_1/4 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$to_real(rat_5/12) = real_5/12 & rat_$to_real(rat_0) = real_0 & % 9.85/2.11 int_$to_rat(0) = rat_0 & rat_$quotient(rat_0, rat_1/4) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$quotient(rat_0, rat_5/12) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_1/4, rat_0) = rat_0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$product(rat_5/12, rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_1/4) = rat_0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_5/12) = rat_0 & rat_$product(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$difference(rat_1/4, rat_1/4) = rat_0 & rat_$difference(rat_1/4, rat_0) = % 9.85/2.11 rat_1/4 & rat_$difference(rat_5/12, rat_5/12) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$difference(rat_5/12, rat_0) = rat_5/12 & rat_$difference(rat_0, rat_0) = % 9.85/2.11 rat_0 & rat_$uminus(rat_0) = rat_0 & rat_$sum(rat_1/4, rat_0) = rat_1/4 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$sum(rat_5/12, rat_0) = rat_5/12 & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_1/4) = rat_1/4 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_5/12) = rat_5/12 & rat_$sum(rat_0, rat_0) = rat_0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greatereq(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_1/4, % 9.85/2.11 rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_1/4, rat_5/12) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greatereq(rat_1/4, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greatereq(rat_5/12, rat_5/12) = 0 & rat_$greatereq(rat_5/12, rat_0) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_1/4) = 1 & rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_5/12) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greatereq(rat_0, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_1/4) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greater(rat_very_large, rat_5/12) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_large, % 9.85/2.11 rat_0) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greater(rat_1/4, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_1/4, rat_1/4) = 1 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$greater(rat_1/4, rat_5/12) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_1/4, rat_0) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greater(rat_5/12, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = % 9.85/2.11 0 & rat_$greater(rat_5/12, rat_5/12) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_5/12, rat_0) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_very_small) = 0 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_1/4) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_5/12) = 1 & rat_$greater(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small, % 9.85/2.11 rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_5/12) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_very_small, rat_0) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_1/4, rat_very_large) = 0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$less(rat_1/4, rat_1/4) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_1/4, rat_5/12) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_1/4, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_5/12, rat_very_large) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_5/12, rat_5/12) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_5/12, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_very_large) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_0, rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$less(rat_0, rat_5/12) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(rat_0, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_very_small, rat_very_large) = 0 % 9.85/2.11 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/4, rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_1/4, rat_5/12) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$lesseq(rat_1/4, rat_0) = 1 & rat_$lesseq(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$lesseq(rat_5/12, rat_5/12) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_5/12, rat_0) = 1 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_1/4) = 0 & rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_5/12) = 0 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$lesseq(rat_0, rat_0) = 0 & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] % 9.85/2.11 : ! [v3: $rat] : ! [v4: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v0) = v4) | ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_$sum(v2, v1) = v3) | ? [v5: $rat] : (rat_$sum(v2, v5) = v4 & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v5)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : % 9.85/2.11 ! [v3: $rat] : (v3 = v1 | v0 = rat_0 | ~ (rat_$quotient(v2, v0) = v3) | ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] % 9.85/2.11 : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (rat_$less(v2, v0) = v3) | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, % 9.85/2.11 v0) = 0) | ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$less(v2, v1) = v4)) & ! % 9.85/2.11 [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_$lesseq(v2, v0) = v3) | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) | ? [v4: int] : ( % 9.85/2.11 ~ (v4 = 0) & rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = v4)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : % 9.85/2.11 ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v2) | ~ (rat_$sum(v1, % 9.85/2.11 v2) = v3) | rat_$difference(v1, v0) = v3) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: % 9.85/2.11 $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v2 = rat_0 | ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) | ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: int] : % 9.85/2.11 (v2 = 0 | ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v3)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: int] % 9.85/2.11 : (v2 = 0 | ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & % 9.85/2.11 rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: int] : % 9.85/2.11 (v2 = 0 | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) & ? [v3: int] : ( ~ % 9.85/2.11 (v3 = 0) & rat_$less(v1, v0) = v3))) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : % 9.85/2.11 ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$product(v0, v1) = v2) | rat_$product(v1, v0) = v2) & % 9.85/2.11 ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$sum(v0, v1) = v2) | % 9.85/2.11 rat_$sum(v1, v0) = v2) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ( ~ % 9.85/2.11 (rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v2, v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v2, v0) = % 9.85/2.12 0) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$sum(v0, rat_0) = % 9.85/2.12 v1)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) % 9.85/2.12 = 0) | rat_$less(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$uminus(v0) = v1) | rat_$uminus(v1) = v0) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greatereq(v0, v1) = 0) | rat_$lesseq(v1, v0) = 0) & ! % 9.85/2.12 [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ( ~ (rat_$greater(v0, v1) = 0) | rat_$less(v1, % 9.85/2.12 v0) = 0) & ! [v0: $rat] : (v0 = rat_0 | ~ (rat_$uminus(v0) = v0)) % 9.85/2.12 % 9.85/2.12 (function-axioms) % 9.85/2.12 ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$quotient(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$product(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$product(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$difference(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! % 9.85/2.12 [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$sum(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 9.85/2.12 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$greatereq(v3, % 9.85/2.12 v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : % 9.85/2.12 ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$greater(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: % 9.85/2.12 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$less(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 9.85/2.12 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $rat] : ! [v3: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = % 9.85/2.12 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$is_int(v2) = v0)) & % 9.85/2.12 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = % 9.85/2.12 v0 | ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$is_rat(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] % 9.85/2.12 : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$floor(v2) = v1) | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$floor(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 % 9.85/2.12 = v0 | ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$ceiling(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) = % 9.85/2.12 v1) | ~ (rat_$truncate(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! % 9.85/2.12 [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$round(v2) = v0)) & % 9.85/2.12 ! [v0: int] : ! [v1: int] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) = % 9.85/2.12 v1) | ~ (rat_$to_int(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: % 9.85/2.12 $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) & % 9.85/2.12 ! [v0: $real] : ! [v1: $real] : ! [v2: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (rat_$to_real(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$to_real(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! % 9.85/2.12 [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: int] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (int_$to_rat(v2) = v1) | ~ % 9.85/2.12 (int_$to_rat(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $rat] : ! [v1: $rat] : ! [v2: $rat] : % 9.85/2.12 (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v1) | ~ (rat_$uminus(v2) = v0)) % 9.85/2.12 % 9.85/2.12 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 9.85/2.12 --------------------------------- % 9.85/2.12 % 9.85/2.12 Begin of proof % 9.85/2.13 | % 9.85/2.13 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 9.85/2.13 | (1) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $rat] % 9.85/2.13 | : ! [v3: $rat] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 9.85/2.13 | (rat_$lesseq(v3, v2) = v0)) % 9.85/2.13 | % 9.85/2.13 | ALPHA: (input) implies: % 9.85/2.13 | (2) rat_$lesseq(rat_5/12, rat_1/4) = 1 % 9.85/2.13 | % 9.85/2.13 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, 1, rat_1/4, rat_5/12, simplifying with % 9.85/2.13 | (2), (rat_lesseq_problem_3) gives: % 9.85/2.13 | (3) $false % 9.85/2.13 | % 9.85/2.13 | CLOSE: (3) is inconsistent. % 9.85/2.13 | % 9.85/2.13 End of proof % 9.85/2.13 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 9.85/2.13 % 9.85/2.13 1514ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------