↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI263_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.96s 1.40s
% Output   : Proof 7.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ARI263_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:59:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.67  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.67  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.67  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.67  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.67  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.67  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.67  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.67                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.67  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.67  
% 0.20/0.67  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.68  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.69  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.70  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.38/0.97  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 2.16/1.03  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.16/1.03  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.10  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.10  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.10  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.10  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.10  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.44/1.37  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.77/1.39  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.77/1.40  Prover 6: proved (704ms)
% 4.77/1.40  
% 4.96/1.40  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.96/1.40  
% 4.96/1.41  Prover 2: stopped
% 4.96/1.42  Prover 0: proved (714ms)
% 4.96/1.42  
% 4.96/1.42  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.96/1.42  
% 4.96/1.42  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.08/1.42  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.08/1.42  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.08/1.42  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.08/1.42  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.08/1.42  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.08/1.44  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.08/1.45  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.08/1.46  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 5.08/1.49  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.08/1.49  Prover 3: stopped
% 5.08/1.50  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.08/1.50  Prover 5: stopped
% 5.08/1.50  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.08/1.51  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.77/1.52  Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.77/1.52  Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.77/1.52  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 5.77/1.54  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.34/1.63  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.34/1.63  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.34/1.64  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 6.34/1.64  Prover 1: proved (947ms)
% 6.34/1.64  Prover 4: stopped
% 6.34/1.66  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.34/1.66  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.34/1.66  Prover 8: stopped
% 6.34/1.67  Prover 11: stopped
% 6.99/1.68  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.99/1.69  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.99/1.69  Prover 13: stopped
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.26/1.77  Prover 10: stopped
% 7.26/1.77  
% 7.26/1.77  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.26/1.77  
% 7.26/1.78  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.26/1.78  Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.26/1.78  ---------------------------------
% 7.26/1.78  
% 7.26/1.78    (rat_sum_problem_18)
% 7.26/1.78    $false
% 7.26/1.78  
% 7.26/1.78  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 7.26/1.78  ---------------------------------
% 7.26/1.78  
% 7.26/1.78  Begin of proof
% 7.26/1.78  | 
% 7.26/1.78  | CLOSE: (rat_sum_problem_18) is inconsistent.
% 7.26/1.78  | 
% 7.26/1.78  End of proof
% 7.26/1.78  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.26/1.78  
% 7.26/1.78  1112ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------