↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : ARI312_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:47:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.77s 1.60s
% Output   : Proof 9.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : ARI312_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:13:16 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.17/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.17/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.17/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.17/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.17/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.17/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.17/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.17/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.17/0.62  
% 0.17/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.61/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.61/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.33/1.00  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.81/1.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.81/1.09  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.16  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.16  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.16  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.17  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.17  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.04/1.55  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.77/1.59  Prover 6: proved (943ms)
% 5.77/1.59  
% 5.77/1.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.77/1.60  
% 5.77/1.60  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.77/1.60  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.77/1.60  Prover 0: stopped
% 5.77/1.60  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.77/1.61  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.87/1.61  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 5.94/1.62  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.94/1.66  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.94/1.68  Prover 2: stopped
% 5.94/1.70  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.94/1.70  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 6.56/1.75  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.56/1.78  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.56/1.78  Prover 5: stopped
% 7.16/1.79  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.16/1.81  Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 7.16/1.84  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.16/1.84  Prover 3: stopped
% 7.16/1.85  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.16/1.85  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.16/1.85  Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains rationals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 7.16/1.86  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 7.16/1.86  Prover 1: proved (1220ms)
% 7.16/1.86  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.16/1.86  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.89/1.89  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.89/1.93  Prover 13: stopped
% 7.89/1.95  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.89/1.96  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.89/1.96  Prover 8: stopped
% 7.89/1.97  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.89/1.97  Prover 4: stopped
% 8.79/2.02  Prover 10: stopped
% 8.84/2.10  Prover 11: stopped
% 8.84/2.10  
% 8.84/2.10  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.84/2.10  
% 8.84/2.10  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.19/2.11  Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.19/2.11  ---------------------------------
% 9.19/2.11  
% 9.19/2.11    (rat_uminus_problem_5)
% 9.19/2.11    $false
% 9.19/2.11  
% 9.19/2.11  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.19/2.11  ---------------------------------
% 9.19/2.11  
% 9.19/2.11  Begin of proof
% 9.19/2.12  | 
% 9.19/2.12  | CLOSE: (rat_uminus_problem_5) is inconsistent.
% 9.19/2.12  | 
% 9.19/2.12  End of proof
% 9.19/2.12  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.19/2.12  
% 9.19/2.12  1498ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------