%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : ARI574_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:08 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.44s 1.02s % Output : Refutation 0.44s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : ARI574_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 13:06:29 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.47 % Using integer theory % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_12119_n013.cluster.edu % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.44/1.02 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.44/1.02 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_12119_n013.cluster.edu % 0.44/1.02 SPASS derived 9 clauses, backtracked 6 clauses and kept 48 clauses. % 0.44/1.02 SPASS backtracked 2 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.44/1.02 SPASS allocated 6228 KBytes. % 0.44/1.02 SPASS spent 0:00:00.01 on the problem. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the reduction. % 0.44/1.02 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_12119_n013.cluster.edu % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 7 : % 0.44/1.02 1[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(skc3,4)* equal(skc3,4). % 0.44/1.02 3(e)[0:Inp] || -> equal(skc3,4) lesseq(7,plus(skc2,skc3))*. % 0.44/1.02 4[0:Inp] || -> equal(skc2,3) lesseq(7,plus(skc2,skc3))*. % 0.44/1.02 5(e)[0:Inp] || -> equal(skc3,4) lesseq(plus(skc2,5),times(2,skc3))*. % 0.44/1.02 6[0:Inp] || -> equal(skc2,3) lesseq(plus(skc2,5),times(2,skc3))*. % 0.44/1.02 7[0:Inp] || equal(skc3,4) equal(skc2,3) lesseq(skc3,4) lesseq(plus(skc2,5),times(2,skc3))* lesseq(7,plus(skc2,skc3)) -> . % 0.44/1.02 64(e)[0:ThR:7,6,5,4,3,1] || -> . % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_12119_n013.cluster.edu % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 Formulae used in the proof : fof_ineq_sys_has_1_sol % 0.44/1.02 % 0.44/1.02 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------