↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : ARI574_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:33:23 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.30s 1.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  10 unt;   0 typ;  11 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  127 (  47 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  132 (  47   ~;  45   |;  28   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  228 (  53 atm;  53 fun; 108 num;  14 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (   8 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (   5 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   6   !;   8   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: $int ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sF2: $int ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sF3: $int ).

tff(func_def_11,type,
    sF4: $int ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ( ( X1 = 4 )
        & ( X0 = 3 ) )
    <=> ( $lesseq(7,$sum(X0,X1))
        & $lesseq($sum(X0,5),$product(2,X1))
        & $lesseq(X1,4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ineq_sys_has_1_sol) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
        ( ( ( X1 = 4 )
          & ( X0 = 3 ) )
      <=> ( $lesseq(7,$sum(X0,X1))
          & $lesseq($sum(X0,5),$product(2,X1))
          & $lesseq(X1,4) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: $int,X0: $int] :
        ( ( ~ $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
          & ~ $less(4,X1)
          & ~ $less($sum(X0,X1),7) )
      <=> ( ( X1 = 4 )
          & ( X0 = 3 ) ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f4,plain,
    ? [X1: $int,X0: $int] :
      ( ( ~ $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
        & ~ $less(4,X1)
        & ~ $less($sum(X0,X1),7) )
    <~> ( ( X1 = 4 )
        & ( X0 = 3 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ? [X1: $int,X0: $int] :
      ( ( ( 4 != X1 )
        | ( 3 != X0 )
        | $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
        | $less(4,X1)
        | $less($sum(X0,X1),7) )
      & ( ( ( X1 = 4 )
          & ( X0 = 3 ) )
        | ( ~ $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
          & ~ $less(4,X1)
          & ~ $less($sum(X0,X1),7) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ? [X1: $int,X0: $int] :
      ( ( ( 4 != X1 )
        | ( 3 != X0 )
        | $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
        | $less(4,X1)
        | $less($sum(X0,X1),7) )
      & ( ( ( X1 = 4 )
          & ( X0 = 3 ) )
        | ( ~ $less($product(2,X1),$sum(X0,5))
          & ~ $less(4,X1)
          & ~ $less($sum(X0,X1),7) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ( ( 4 != X0 )
        | ( 3 != X1 )
        | $less($product(2,X0),$sum(X1,5))
        | $less(4,X0)
        | $less($sum(X1,X0),7) )
      & ( ( ( 4 = X0 )
          & ( 3 = X1 ) )
        | ( ~ $less($product(2,X0),$sum(X1,5))
          & ~ $less(4,X0)
          & ~ $less($sum(X1,X0),7) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ( ( 4 != sK0 )
      | ( 3 != sK1 )
      | $less($product(2,sK0),$sum(sK1,5))
      | $less(4,sK0)
      | $less($sum(sK1,sK0),7) )
    & ( ( ( 4 = sK0 )
        & ( 3 = sK1 ) )
      | ( ~ $less($product(2,sK0),$sum(sK1,5))
        & ~ $less(4,sK0)
        & ~ $less($sum(sK1,sK0),7) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f7]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( 3 = sK1 )
    | ~ $less($sum(sK1,sK0),7) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ~ $less(4,sK0)
    | ( 3 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ( ( 3 = sK1 )
    | ~ $less($product(2,sK0),$sum(sK1,5)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ( ~ $less(4,sK0)
    | ( 4 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ( 4 = sK0 )
    | ~ $less($product(2,sK0),$sum(sK1,5)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ( ( 4 != sK0 )
    | ( 3 != sK1 )
    | $less($product(2,sK0),$sum(sK1,5))
    | $less(4,sK0)
    | $less($sum(sK1,sK0),7) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f16,definition,
    sF2 = $product(2,sK0),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF2])],[function_definition]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    $product(2,sK0) = sF2,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f18,definition,
    sF3 = $sum(sK1,5),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF3])],[function_definition]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    $sum(sK1,5) = sF3,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f20,definition,
    sF4 = $sum(sK1,sK0),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sF4])],[function_definition]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    $sum(sK1,sK0) = sF4,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ( ( 4 != sK0 )
    | $less(4,sK0)
    | $less(sF2,sF3)
    | ( 3 != sK1 )
    | $less(sF4,7) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f15,f21,f19,f17]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ( ~ $less(sF2,sF3)
    | ( 4 = sK0 ) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f14,f19,f17]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ( ( 3 = sK1 )
    | ~ $less(sF2,sF3) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f11,f19,f17]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ( ~ $less(sF4,7)
    | ( 3 = sK1 ) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f9,f21]) ).

tff(f28,definition,
    ( spl5_1
  <=> $less(sF2,sF3) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f32,definition,
    ( spl5_2
  <=> ( 3 = sK1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_1
    | spl5_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f25,f32,f28]) ).

tff(f37,definition,
    ( spl5_3
  <=> $less(sF4,7) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f41,definition,
    ( spl5_4
  <=> $less(4,sK0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f45,definition,
    ( spl5_5
  <=> ( 4 = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f48,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_2
    | spl5_3
    | spl5_4
    | spl5_1
    | ~ spl5_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f45,f28,f41,f37,f32]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    ( spl5_5
    | ~ spl5_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f28,f45]) ).

tff(f52,definition,
    ( spl5_6
  <=> ( $sum(sK1,sK0) = sF4 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f55,plain,
    spl5_6,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f52]) ).

tff(f56,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_4
    | spl5_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f45,f41]) ).

tff(f58,definition,
    ( spl5_7
  <=> ( $sum(sK1,5) = sF3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f61,plain,
    spl5_7,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f58]) ).

tff(f62,plain,
    ( spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f37,f32]) ).

tff(f64,definition,
    ( spl5_8
  <=> ( $product(2,sK0) = sF2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_8])],[avatar_definition]) ).

tff(f67,plain,
    spl5_8,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f17,f64]) ).

tff(f68,plain,
    ( spl5_2
    | ~ spl5_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f41,f32]) ).

tff(f69,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_smt_refutation,[],[f68,f67,f62,f61,f56,f55,f49,f48,f35]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : ARI574_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.27  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.25/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.25/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.25/0.27  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.25/0.27  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.25/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.25/0.27  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.25/0.27  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 20:55:47 UTC 2026
% 0.25/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/0.28  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005582)Detected arithmetic, will pick strategies from an ALASCA-aware ARI schedule.
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)dis+1002_1_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:spb=units:tha=off:random_seed=2455824623:i=307:kws=precedence:nm=0:rtra=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/307Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005593)lrs+10_1_tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:random_seed=2266885468:i=33:rtra=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/33Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)First to succeed.
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3005582"
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005593)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005592)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sas=z3:si=on:tha=off:random_seed=1253991077:i=46:rtra=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/46Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)dis+21_64_to=kbo:sil=128000:si=on:sp=weighted_frequency:uwa=alasca_can_abstract:random_seed=3174835226:i=4:rtra=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005587)dis+1002_16:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:sas=z3:si=on:norm_ineq=on:gve=force:uwa=one_side_constant:random_seed=2590633594:i=12:doe=on:rtra=on:gtg=exists_top:ss=axioms_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/12Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)lrs+1002_4:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:si=on:br=off:random_seed=2061433726:s2a=on:i=7:rtra=on:inst=on_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005589)dis+10_3_slsqr=1,4:to=lpo:sil=128000:thi=strong:si=on:uwa=off:s2agt=20:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=3020615818:i=201:slsql=off:asg=cautious:rtra=on:gtg=all:ss=axioms:sgt=16_3000 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/201Mi)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005591)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005590)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005592)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005587)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.30/1.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.30/1.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Time elapsed: 0.029 s
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005588)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.40  % (3005582)Success in time 0.439 s
% 0.30/1.40  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------