%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : ARI610_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:18 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.45s 1.02s % Output : Refutation 0.45s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ARI610_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 12:56:36 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.47 % Using integer theory % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_10205_n027.cluster.edu % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.45/1.02 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.45/1.02 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_10205_n027.cluster.edu % 0.45/1.02 SPASS derived 128 clauses, backtracked 51 clauses and kept 164 clauses. % 0.45/1.02 SPASS backtracked 3 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.45/1.02 SPASS allocated 6327 KBytes. % 0.45/1.02 SPASS spent 0:00:00.02 on the problem. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.45/1.02 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_10205_n027.cluster.edu % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 4 : % 0.45/1.02 4(e)[0:Inp] || -> less(f(b),f(a))*. % 0.45/1.02 5[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,V) -> lesseq(f(U),f(V))*. % 0.45/1.02 6[0:Inp] || lesseq(f(0),f(plus(a,uminus(b))))* -> . % 0.45/1.02 213(e)[0:ThR:6,5,4] || -> . % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_10205_n027.cluster.edu % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 Formulae used in the proof : fof_f_type fof_f_mon_implies_f_a_b_2 % 0.45/1.02 % 0.45/1.02 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------