%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : ARI617_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:18:20 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.77s 1.04s % Output : Refutation 0.77s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ARI617_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 11:04:08 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.47 % Using integer theory % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_14637_n010.cluster.edu % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.77/1.04 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.77/1.04 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_14637_n010.cluster.edu % 0.77/1.04 SPASS derived 170 clauses, backtracked 10 clauses and kept 95 clauses. % 0.77/1.04 SPASS backtracked 2 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.77/1.04 SPASS allocated 6336 KBytes. % 0.77/1.04 SPASS spent 0:00:00.02 on the problem. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.77/1.04 0:00:00.00 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_14637_n010.cluster.edu % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 7 : % 0.77/1.04 3[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(U,f(U))*. % 0.77/1.04 4[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(0,g(U))*. % 0.77/1.04 5[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(uminus(U),f(U))*. % 0.77/1.04 6[0:Inp] || equal(g(skc1),f(skc1))** -> . % 0.77/1.04 7[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(f(U),U) lesseq(f(U),uminus(U))*. % 0.77/1.04 8[0:Inp] || -> equal(g(U),U) equal(g(U),uminus(U))**. % 0.77/1.04 283(e)[0:ThR:8,7,6,5,4,3] || -> . % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_14637_n010.cluster.edu % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 Formulae used in the proof : fof_f_type fof_absolute_value_defs % 0.77/1.04 % 0.77/1.04 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------