%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : ARI759_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:49:02 EDT 2023 % Result : Unsatisfiable 24.74s 4.04s % Output : Proof 30.91s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ARI759_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:22:55 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.59 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.59 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.59 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.59 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.59 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.59 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.59 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.59 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.59 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.59 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.59 % 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.37/1.01 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.01 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.02 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.02 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.02 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.02 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 2.37/1.02 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 9.37/1.96 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.97 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.98 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.98 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.99 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.99 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 9.37/1.99 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 23.78/4.00 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 23.78/4.00 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 24.74/4.03 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 24.74/4.04 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 24.74/4.04 Prover 3: proved (3411ms) % 24.74/4.04 % 24.74/4.04 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 24.74/4.04 % 24.74/4.05 Prover 6: proved (3405ms) % 24.74/4.05 % 24.74/4.05 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 24.74/4.05 % 24.74/4.05 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 24.74/4.05 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 24.74/4.06 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 25.29/4.06 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 25.29/4.07 Prover 0: stopped % 25.29/4.08 Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 25.29/4.08 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 25.85/4.14 Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 25.85/4.16 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 25.85/4.17 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1) % 25.85/4.17 Prover 4: proved (3534ms) % 26.09/4.18 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 26.09/4.18 Prover 1: stopped % 28.17/4.46 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 28.17/4.46 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 28.42/4.48 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 28.88/4.54 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 28.88/4.54 Prover 2: stopped % 28.88/4.59 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 28.88/4.59 Prover 5: stopped % 28.88/4.60 Prover 10: stopped % 28.88/4.60 Prover 7: stopped % 30.75/4.94 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 30.91/4.98 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 30.91/4.98 Prover 8: stopped % 30.91/4.98 % 30.91/4.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 30.91/4.98 % 30.91/4.98 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 30.91/5.00 Assumptions after simplification: % 30.91/5.00 --------------------------------- % 30.91/5.00 % 30.91/5.00 (formula_165) % 30.91/5.00 $false % 30.91/5.00 % 30.91/5.00 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 30.91/5.00 -------------------------------------------- % 30.91/5.00 formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_101, formula_102, formula_103, % 30.91/5.00 formula_104, formula_105, formula_106, formula_107, formula_108, formula_109, % 30.91/5.00 formula_11, formula_110, formula_111, formula_112, formula_113, formula_114, % 30.91/5.00 formula_115, formula_116, formula_117, formula_118, formula_119, formula_12, % 30.91/5.00 formula_120, formula_121, formula_122, formula_123, formula_124, formula_125, % 30.91/5.00 formula_126, formula_127, formula_128, formula_129, formula_13, formula_130, % 30.91/5.00 formula_131, formula_132, formula_133, formula_134, formula_135, formula_136, % 30.91/5.00 formula_137, formula_138, formula_139, formula_14, formula_140, formula_141, % 30.91/5.00 formula_142, formula_143, formula_144, formula_145, formula_146, formula_147, % 30.91/5.00 formula_148, formula_149, formula_15, formula_150, formula_151, formula_152, % 30.91/5.00 formula_153, formula_154, formula_155, formula_156, formula_157, formula_158, % 30.91/5.00 formula_159, formula_16, formula_160, formula_161, formula_162, formula_163, % 30.91/5.00 formula_164, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19, formula_2, formula_20, % 30.91/5.00 formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24, formula_25, formula_26, % 30.91/5.00 formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3, formula_30, formula_31, % 30.91/5.00 formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35, formula_36, formula_37, % 30.91/5.00 formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40, formula_41, formula_42, % 30.91/5.00 formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46, formula_47, formula_48, % 30.91/5.00 formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51, formula_52, formula_53, % 30.91/5.00 formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57, formula_58, formula_59, % 30.91/5.00 formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62, formula_63, formula_64, % 30.91/5.00 formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68, formula_69, formula_7, % 30.91/5.00 formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73, formula_74, formula_75, % 30.91/5.00 formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79, formula_8, formula_80, % 30.91/5.00 formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84, formula_85, formula_86, % 30.91/5.00 formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9, formula_90, formula_91, % 30.91/5.00 formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95, formula_96, formula_97, % 30.91/5.01 formula_98, formula_99 % 30.91/5.01 % 30.91/5.01 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 30.91/5.01 --------------------------------- % 30.91/5.01 % 30.91/5.01 Begin of proof % 30.91/5.01 | % 30.91/5.01 | CLOSE: (formula_165) is inconsistent. % 30.91/5.01 | % 30.91/5.01 End of proof % 30.91/5.01 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 30.91/5.01 % 30.91/5.01 4411ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------