↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : BOO003-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : add(VAR_0,VAR_1) = add(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    add(A,B) = add(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_add]) ).

fof(distributivity4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : multiply(VAR_0,add(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = add(multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1),multiply(VAR_0,VAR_2)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity4) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    multiply(A,add(B,C)) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity4]) ).

fof(additive_inverse1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : add(VAR_0,inverse(VAR_0)) = multiplicative_identity,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    add(A,inverse(A)) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_inverse1]) ).

fof(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : multiply(VAR_0,inverse(VAR_0)) = additive_identity,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    multiply(A,inverse(A)) = additive_identity,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_inverse1]) ).

fof(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : multiply(VAR_0,multiplicative_identity) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_id1) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    multiply(A,multiplicative_identity) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_id1]) ).

fof(additive_id2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : add(additive_identity,VAR_0) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_id2) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    add(additive_identity,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_id2]) ).

fof(prove_a_times_a_is_a,axiom,
    multiply(a,a) != a,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_a_times_a_is_a) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    multiply(a,a) != a,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_a_times_a_is_a]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    multiply(A,multiplicative_identity) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,inverse(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    A = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,inverse(B))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,inverse(B))) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    add(multiply(A,A),additive_identity) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_60,plain,
    add(additive_identity,multiply(A,A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    multiply(A,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : BOO003-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:30:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 647970 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 22:30:55 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.37  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.12/0.37  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.12/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.12/0.37  % Given clauses 15.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------