↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : BOO005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:35:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 17.71s 2.51s
% Output   : Proof 17.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : BOO005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:06:12 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.71/2.51  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 17.71/2.51  
% 17.71/2.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 17.71/2.51  
% 17.71/2.52  % SZS output start Proof
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 1 (additive_inverse1): sum(inverse(X), X, multiplicative_identity) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 2 (multiplicative_identity2): product(X, multiplicative_identity, X) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 3 (multiplicative_identity1): product(multiplicative_identity, X, X) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq2(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 6 (closure_of_addition): sum(X, Y, add(X, Y)) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 7 (commutativity_of_addition): ifeq(sum(X, Y, Z), true, sum(Y, X, Z), true) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 8 (addition_is_well_defined): ifeq2(sum(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq2(sum(X, Y, W), true, W, Z), Z) = Z.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 9 (multiplication_is_well_defined): ifeq2(product(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq2(product(X, Y, W), true, W, Z), Z) = Z.
% 17.71/2.52  Axiom 10 (distributivity7): ifeq(product(X, Y, Z), true, ifeq(sum(Z, W, V), true, ifeq(sum(Y, W, U), true, ifeq(sum(X, W, T), true, product(T, U, V), true), true), true), true) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  
% 17.71/2.52  Goal 1 (prove_equations): sum(x, multiplicative_identity, multiplicative_identity) = true.
% 17.71/2.52  Proof:
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, multiplicative_identity)
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(true, true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 10 (distributivity7) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(product(inverse(x), multiplicative_identity, inverse(x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 2 (multiplicative_identity2) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 1 (additive_inverse1) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(sum(inverse(x), x, multiplicative_identity), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 1 (additive_inverse1) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq(true, true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 6 (closure_of_addition) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(true, true, product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 8 (addition_is_well_defined) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq2(sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)), true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 6 (closure_of_addition) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, ifeq2(true, true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(true, true, sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true), true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 6 (closure_of_addition) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(ifeq(sum(multiplicative_identity, x, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true, sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(multiplicative_identity, x)), true), true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 7 (commutativity_of_addition) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(true, true, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(multiplicative_identity, x)), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(true, true, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)), add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 3 (multiplicative_identity1) R->L }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity), add(x, multiplicative_identity)), true, ifeq2(product(multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity), multiplicative_identity), true, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity)), add(x, multiplicative_identity)))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 9 (multiplication_is_well_defined) }
% 17.71/2.52    sum(x, multiplicative_identity, add(x, multiplicative_identity))
% 17.71/2.52  = { by axiom 6 (closure_of_addition) }
% 17.71/2.52    true
% 17.71/2.52  % SZS output end Proof
% 17.71/2.52  
% 17.71/2.52  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------