↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO007-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:06:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  50 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (  49 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(additive_id1,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',additive_id1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(distributivity2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',distributivity2) ).

cnf(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',multiplicative_id1) ).

cnf(distributivity1,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',distributivity1) ).

cnf(additive_inverse1,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(prove_associativity,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,c)) != multiply(multiply(a,b),c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    additive_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distributivity2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    multiplicative_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    distributivity1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    additive_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,add(X2,multiplicative_identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,add(X1,multiplicative_identity)) = multiply(additive_identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    add(X1,multiplicative_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X1)) = add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    multiplicative_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_9]),c_0_23]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    add(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_25]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = inverse(inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(multiply(X1,X2),X4)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(multiply(X1,X3),X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    add(multiplicative_identity,X1) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_28]),c_0_17]),c_0_21]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_21]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,inverse(X1)),X3)) = add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_14]),c_0_12]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_12]),c_0_32]),c_0_12]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,c)) != multiply(multiply(a,b),c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_34]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X2,X1),X3)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_35]),c_0_29]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)) = multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_37]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,inverse(X1)))) = add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,multiply(b,c)) != multiply(multiply(a,b),c),
    c_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_15]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,X1))) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_42]),c_0_29]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(c,multiply(a,b)) != multiply(a,multiply(b,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X3,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_15]),c_0_48]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : BOO007-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.47  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/0.47  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:50:21 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1622133 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.25/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.65  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1622139 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.25/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.65  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.65  
% 0.25/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.25/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.25/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.25/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 225
% 0.25/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 83
% 0.25/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 53
% 0.25/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 89
% 0.25/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 0.25/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 3992
% 0.25/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2632
% 0.25/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 3992
% 0.25/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4994
% 0.25/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 3927
% 0.25/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.25/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 65
% 0.25/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 62
% 0.25/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.25/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.25/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2341
% 0.25/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2341
% 0.25/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.25/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.25/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 202
% 0.25/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 71
% 0.25/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 38244
% 0.25/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.25/0.65  
% 0.25/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.65  % User time                : 0.081 s
% 0.25/0.65  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.25/0.65  % Total time               : 0.089 s
% 0.25/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.25/0.65  
% 0.25/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.65  % User time                : 0.392 s
% 0.25/0.65  % System time              : 0.040 s
% 0.25/0.65  % Total time               : 0.431 s
% 0.25/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.25/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------