%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:06:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 4.88s 1.24s
% Output : Saturation 4.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_120ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_122ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_121,hypothesis,
product(X1,X2,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
x__plus_y_plus_z != x_plus_y__plus_z,
c_0_120,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
sum(X1,X2,X3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_121]),c_0_121])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:50:52 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.88/1.24 % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.88/1.24 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.88/1.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % new_bool_3 with pid 1623608 completed with status 9
% 4.88/1.24 % new_bool_1 with pid 1623609 completed with status 9
% 4.88/1.24 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1623607 completed with status 1
% 4.88/1.24 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 4.88/1.24 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.88/1.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.88/1.24 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.88/1.24 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 4.88/1.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % new_bool_1 with pid 1623616 completed with status 1
% 4.88/1.24 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 4.88/1.24 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.88/1.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.88/1.24 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.88/1.24 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 4.88/1.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.88/1.24 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 4.88/1.24 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.88/1.24
% 4.88/1.24 % No proof found!
% 4.88/1.24 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 4.88/1.24 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 4.88/1.24 % Parsed axioms : 21
% 4.88/1.24 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Initial clauses : 21
% 4.88/1.24 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 4.88/1.24 % Processed clauses : 5535
% 4.88/1.24 % ...of these trivial : 1228
% 4.88/1.24 % ...subsumed : 1423
% 4.88/1.24 % ...remaining for further processing : 2884
% 4.88/1.24 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Backward-subsumed : 306
% 4.88/1.24 % Backward-rewritten : 2554
% 4.88/1.24 % Generated clauses : 120087
% 4.88/1.24 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 103787
% 4.88/1.24 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Paramodulations : 120087
% 4.88/1.24 % Factorizations : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % NegExts : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Total rewrite steps : 20989
% 4.88/1.24 % ...of those cached : 16366
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.88/1.24 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 4.88/1.25 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 4.88/1.25 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 4.88/1.25 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 4.88/1.25 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Current number of archived clauses : 2881
% 4.88/1.25 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 212102
% 4.88/1.25 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 173958
% 4.88/1.25 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1729
% 4.88/1.25 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4692
% 4.88/1.25 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % BW rewrite match attempts : 33404
% 4.88/1.25 % BW rewrite match successes : 1845
% 4.88/1.25 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.88/1.25 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1772650
% 4.88/1.25 % Search garbage collected termcells : 36
% 4.88/1.25
% 4.88/1.25 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.88/1.25 % User time : 0.773 s
% 4.88/1.25 % System time : 0.041 s
% 4.88/1.25 % Total time : 0.814 s
% 4.88/1.25 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 4.88/1.25
% 4.88/1.25 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.88/1.25 % User time : 3.897 s
% 4.88/1.25 % System time : 0.255 s
% 4.88/1.25 % Total time : 4.152 s
% 4.88/1.25 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 4.88/1.25 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------