%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 7.32s 16.67s
% Output : Saturation 7.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_111ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_114ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_113,hypothesis,
sum(X1,X2,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
x__plus_y_plus_z != x_plus_y__plus_z,
c_0_111,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
product(X1,X2,X3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_113]),c_0_113])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : BOO008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/15.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/15.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/15.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/15.33 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/15.33 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/15.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/15.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/15.33 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:47:38 UTC 2026
% 0.04/15.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/15.34 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/15.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/15.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.32/16.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.32/16.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.32/16.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % new_bool_1 with pid 2509339 completed with status 9
% 7.32/16.67 % new_bool_3 with pid 2509338 completed with status 9
% 7.32/16.67 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2509337 completed with status 1
% 7.32/16.67 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 7.32/16.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.32/16.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.32/16.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.32/16.67 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 7.32/16.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2509343 completed with status 1
% 7.32/16.67 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 7.32/16.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 7.32/16.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.32/16.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.32/16.67 % Search class: FHUSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 7.32/16.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 7.32/16.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 7.32/16.67 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.32/16.67
% 7.32/16.67 % No proof found!
% 7.32/16.67 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 7.32/16.67 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 7.32/16.67 % Parsed axioms : 21
% 7.32/16.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Initial clauses : 21
% 7.32/16.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 7.32/16.67 % Processed clauses : 5903
% 7.32/16.67 % ...of these trivial : 1882
% 7.32/16.67 % ...subsumed : 511
% 7.32/16.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 3510
% 7.32/16.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Backward-subsumed : 263
% 7.32/16.67 % Backward-rewritten : 3223
% 7.32/16.67 % Generated clauses : 108720
% 7.32/16.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 92994
% 7.32/16.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Paramodulations : 108720
% 7.32/16.67 % Factorizations : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % NegExts : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Total rewrite steps : 24117
% 7.32/16.67 % ...of those cached : 18611
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.32/16.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 7.32/16.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 7.32/16.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.32/16.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 7.32/16.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 3507
% 7.32/16.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 107388
% 7.32/16.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93851
% 7.32/16.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 774
% 7.32/16.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11843
% 7.32/16.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 22529
% 7.32/16.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 2459
% 7.32/16.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.32/16.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1343199
% 7.32/16.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 36
% 7.32/16.67
% 7.32/16.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.32/16.67 % User time : 1.202 s
% 7.32/16.67 % System time : 0.052 s
% 7.32/16.67 % Total time : 1.254 s
% 7.32/16.67 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 7.32/16.67
% 7.32/16.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.32/16.67 % User time : 6.030 s
% 7.32/16.67 % System time : 0.341 s
% 7.32/16.67 % Total time : 6.371 s
% 7.32/16.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 7.32/16.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------