↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO008-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:06:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   52 (  52 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (  51 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity1,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',distributivity1) ).

cnf(additive_inverse1,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',multiplicative_id1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(additive_id1,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',additive_id1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(distributivity2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO004-0.ax',distributivity2) ).

cnf(prove_associativity,negated_conjecture,
    add(a,add(b,c)) != add(add(a,b),c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    distributivity1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    additive_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    multiplicative_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    multiplicative_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    additive_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distributivity2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    add(additive_identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,inverse(X1))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    inverse(additive_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(X1,multiplicative_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = add(X1,multiply(additive_identity,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    add(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = inverse(inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(add(X2,X1),X3)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    add(a,add(b,c)) != add(add(a,b),c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(add(X2,inverse(X1)),X3)) = multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    add(X1,add(add(X2,X1),X3)) = add(add(X2,X1),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(add(X1,X2),X3)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_36]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X1)) = add(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_30]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    add(a,add(b,c)) != add(add(a,b),c),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X2,add(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_38]),c_0_29]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X1,X3))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    add(c,add(a,b)) != add(a,add(b,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X3,add(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,add(X1,X3))) = add(X2,add(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_45]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    add(b,add(a,c)) != add(a,add(b,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(X2,add(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_42]),c_0_44]),c_0_44]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : BOO008-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:47:56 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1022201 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.18/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.52  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.52  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % new_bool_3 with pid 1022211 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.52  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.52  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.52  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.52  
% 0.18/0.52  % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.18/0.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.18/0.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.18/0.52  % Processed clauses                    : 553
% 0.18/0.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 272
% 0.18/0.52  % ...subsumed                          : 130
% 0.18/0.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 151
% 0.18/0.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 44
% 0.18/0.52  % Generated clauses                    : 10796
% 0.18/0.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5126
% 0.18/0.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Paramodulations                      : 10796
% 0.18/0.52  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12299
% 0.18/0.52  % ...of those cached                   : 10436
% 0.18/0.52  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.52  % Current number of processed clauses  : 98
% 0.18/0.52  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 94
% 0.18/0.52  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.18/0.52  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.52  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4474
% 0.18/0.52  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4474
% 0.18/0.52  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Current number of archived clauses   : 53
% 0.18/0.52  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.18/0.52  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 381
% 0.18/0.52  % BW rewrite match successes           : 179
% 0.18/0.52  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.52  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 79372
% 0.18/0.52  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.18/0.52  
% 0.18/0.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52  % User time                : 0.063 s
% 0.18/0.52  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.52  % Total time               : 0.073 s
% 0.18/0.52  % Maximum resident set size: 3596 pages
% 0.18/0.52  
% 0.18/0.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.52  % User time                : 0.337 s
% 0.18/0.52  % System time              : 0.033 s
% 0.18/0.52  % Total time               : 0.371 s
% 0.18/0.52  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.18/0.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------