↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:06:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.72s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   93 (   8 equ;  51 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  123 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity4,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X3,X5,X7)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X6,X2,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',distributivity4) ).

cnf(additive_identity1,axiom,
    sum(additive_identity,X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',additive_identity1) ).

cnf(additive_identity2,axiom,
    sum(X1,additive_identity,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',additive_identity2) ).

cnf(multiplication_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',multiplication_is_well_defined) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',commutativity_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    product(inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(closure_of_multiplication,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',closure_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(distributivity7,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X6,X2,X7)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X5,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',distributivity7) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | sum(X2,X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(closure_of_addition,axiom,
    sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/BOO002-0.ax',closure_of_addition) ).

cnf(prove_equations,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(x,add(x,y),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equations) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X3,X5,X7)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X6,X2,X7) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[distributivity4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X3,X5,X7)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X6,X2,X7) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    sum(additive_identity,X1,X1),
    additive_identity1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X1)
    | ~ product(X5,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    sum(X1,additive_identity,X1),
    additive_identity2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[multiplication_is_well_defined]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ product(additive_identity,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    product(inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity),
    multiplicative_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)),
    closure_of_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ product(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X2,X1,X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ product(additive_identity,X1,X2)
    | product(inverse(X1),X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,X3,X1)
    | X1 = multiply(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    product(X1,X2,multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ product(inverse(X2),X2,X1)
    | X1 = additive_identity ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X6,X2,X7)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X5,X7) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[distributivity7]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    product(inverse(X1),X1,multiply(additive_identity,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X6,X2,X7)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X2,X5)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | product(X3,X5,X7) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,X1) = additive_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | sum(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X3,X1)
    | ~ sum(X5,X3,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X5,additive_identity)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    product(X1,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | sum(X2,X1,X3) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2)),
    closure_of_addition ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X3,X2,X1)
    | product(X1,X2,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_13]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    sum(X1,X2,add(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(x,add(x,y),x),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_equations]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    product(add(X1,X2),X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(x,add(x,y),x),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    product(X1,add(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : BOO009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:47:27 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.72/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1914833 completed with status 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.72/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.72/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.72/0.65  % Search class: FHUSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.72/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % new_bool_1 with pid 1914841 completed with status 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.72/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.72/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.72/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.72/0.65  % Search class: FHUSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.72/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.72/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.72/0.65  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.72/0.65  
% 0.72/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.72/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.72/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.72/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 23
% 0.72/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 23
% 0.72/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 0.72/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 511
% 0.72/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 29
% 0.72/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 249
% 0.72/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 233
% 0.72/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 0.72/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.72/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 1616
% 0.72/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 938
% 0.72/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 1616
% 0.72/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1251
% 0.72/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 1132
% 0.72/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.72/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 184
% 0.72/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.72/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.72/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.72/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 143
% 0.72/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 438
% 0.72/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1288
% 0.72/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 0.72/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7676
% 0.72/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6142
% 0.72/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 245
% 0.72/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.72/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 218
% 0.72/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 39
% 0.72/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.72/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 16936
% 0.72/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 68
% 0.72/0.65  
% 0.72/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.72/0.65  % User time                : 0.053 s
% 0.72/0.65  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.72/0.65  % Total time               : 0.060 s
% 0.72/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.72/0.65  
% 0.72/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.72/0.65  % User time                : 0.215 s
% 0.72/0.65  % System time              : 0.031 s
% 0.72/0.65  % Total time               : 0.246 s
% 0.72/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.72/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------