↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : BOO009-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   5 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : add(VAR_0,VAR_1) = add(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    add(A,B) = add(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_add]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1) = multiply(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_multiply]) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : add(VAR_0,multiply(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = multiply(add(VAR_0,VAR_1),add(VAR_0,VAR_2)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    add(A,multiply(B,C)) = multiply(add(A,B),add(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    multiply(add(A,B),add(A,C)) = add(A,multiply(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3]) ).

fof(distributivity2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : multiply(VAR_0,add(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = add(multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1),multiply(VAR_0,VAR_2)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity2) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    multiply(A,add(B,C)) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity2]) ).

fof(additive_id1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : add(VAR_0,additive_identity) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_id1) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    add(A,additive_identity) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_id1]) ).

fof(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : multiply(VAR_0,inverse(VAR_0)) = additive_identity,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    multiply(A,inverse(A)) = additive_identity,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_inverse1]) ).

fof(prove_operation,axiom,
    multiply(a,add(a,b)) != a,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_operation) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    multiply(a,add(a,b)) != a,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_operation]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    add(multiply(a,a),multiply(a,b)) != a,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    add(multiply(add(A,B),A),multiply(add(A,B),C)) = add(A,multiply(B,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_70,plain,
    add(multiply(A,add(A,B)),multiply(add(A,B),C)) = add(A,multiply(B,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    add(add(multiply(A,A),multiply(A,B)),multiply(add(A,B),C)) = add(A,multiply(B,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    A = add(additive_identity,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    add(additive_identity,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_identity)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    add(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,additive_identity)) = multiply(A,B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    add(additive_identity,multiply(A,additive_identity)) = multiply(A,inverse(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    multiply(A,additive_identity) = multiply(A,inverse(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    multiply(A,additive_identity) = additive_identity,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_74]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    additive_identity = multiply(additive_identity,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    multiply(additive_identity,A) = additive_identity,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_75]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    add(add(multiply(A,A),additive_identity),multiply(add(A,additive_identity),B)) = add(A,multiply(additive_identity,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    add(add(additive_identity,multiply(A,A)),multiply(add(A,additive_identity),B)) = add(A,multiply(additive_identity,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_76]) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    add(multiply(A,A),multiply(add(A,additive_identity),B)) = add(A,multiply(additive_identity,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    add(multiply(A,A),multiply(A,B)) = add(A,multiply(additive_identity,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_78]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    add(multiply(A,A),multiply(A,B)) = add(A,additive_identity),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    add(multiply(A,A),multiply(A,B)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : BOO009-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:34:16 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.45  % Process 65784 was started by sandbox on n014,
% 0.17/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 22:34:16 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.17/0.48  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.17/0.48  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.17/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.17/0.48  % Given clauses 16.
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------