%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : BOO013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:38:25 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.41s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.13/0.13 % Problem : BOO013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.13/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jun 1 16:09:10 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.14/0.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.14/0.39 # % 0.14/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.39 # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 27 % 0.14/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.39 # 27 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures. % 0.14/0.39 # There are 5 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.39 # Found 15 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.39 # 5 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.39 # 12 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.39 # 15 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.39 % 0.14/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5 % 0.14/0.39 # Returning from population with 24 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.39 # We now have 24 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.41 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.41 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.41 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.41 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.41 % 0.14/0.41 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.41 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (sum(x,y,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (sum(x,z,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (product(x,y,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (product(x,z,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (sum(X1,additive_identity,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (product(X1,multiplicative_identity,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (sum(additive_identity,X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (sum(X1,inverse(X1),multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (product(X1,inverse(X1),additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (sum(inverse(X1),X1,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (product(inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (z!=y)). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X2,X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X2,X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=X2|~sum(X3,X4,X2)|~sum(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (X1=X2|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X7,X1)|~sum(X7,X2,X5)|~sum(X6,X2,X4))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X4,X6,X2)|~product(X4,X7,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X5))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X7,X5,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X4))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X7,X2)|~sum(X1,X7,X5)|~sum(X1,X6,X4))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X2,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X6)|~sum(X6,X7,X3)|~sum(X5,X7,X2)|~sum(X4,X7,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X6)|~sum(X7,X6,X3)|~sum(X7,X5,X2)|~sum(X7,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X1,X4,X5)|~product(X1,X6,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X2))). % 0.14/0.41 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.41 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.41 # Found 7 steps % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (product(x,z,additive_identity)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (product(x,z,additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_37])). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_157, plain, (~product(x,multiplicative_identity,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_35])). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_158, plain, (~sum(x,additive_identity,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (~sum(multiplicative_identity,z,add(multiplicative_identity,z))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_28])). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_155, plain, (product(x,add(multiplicative_identity,z),x)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.14/0.41 cnf(i_0_162, plain, (product(add(multiplicative_identity,z),x,x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_162, ...])). % 0.14/0.42 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.42 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.42 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.42 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.42 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.42 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.42 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.42 % 0.14/0.42 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.42 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (sum(x,y,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (sum(x,z,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (product(x,y,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (product(x,z,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (sum(X1,additive_identity,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (product(X1,multiplicative_identity,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (sum(additive_identity,X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (sum(X1,inverse(X1),multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (product(X1,inverse(X1),additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (sum(inverse(X1),X1,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (product(inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (z!=y)). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X2,X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X2,X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=X2|~sum(X3,X4,X2)|~sum(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (X1=X2|~product(X3,X4,X2)|~product(X3,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X7,X1)|~sum(X7,X2,X5)|~sum(X6,X2,X4))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X4,X6,X2)|~product(X4,X7,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X5))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X7,X5,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X4))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X7,X2)|~sum(X1,X7,X5)|~sum(X1,X6,X4))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X2,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X6)|~sum(X6,X7,X3)|~sum(X5,X7,X2)|~sum(X4,X7,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X6)|~sum(X7,X6,X3)|~sum(X7,X5,X2)|~sum(X7,X4,X1))). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X1,X4,X5)|~product(X1,X6,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X2))). % 0.14/0.42 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.42 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.42 # Found 5 steps % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (product(x,y,additive_identity)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (product(x,y,additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_162, plain, (product(y,x,additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_171, plain, (~product(y,x,multiply(y,x))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_29])). % 0.14/0.42 cnf(i_0_169, plain, (multiply(y,x)=additive_identity), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_169, ...])). % 0.14/0.42 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.42 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.42 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.42 # Child (1943) has found a proof. % 0.14/0.42 % 0.14/0.42 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.42 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------