↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : BOO013-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 15.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  27 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   83 (  44   ~;  39   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (   0 sgn  27   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(closure_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : product(VAR_0,VAR_1,multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',closure_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    product(A,B,multiply(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[closure_of_multiplication]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( sum(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( sum(B,A,C)
    | ~ sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_addition]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( product(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( product(B,A,C)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_multiplication]) ).

fof(multiplicative_identity1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(multiplicative_identity,VAR_0,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_identity1) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    product(multiplicative_identity,A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_identity1]) ).

fof(distributivity3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6] :
      ( sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_6)
      | ~ product(VAR_5,VAR_1,VAR_6)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_3,VAR_1,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity3) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( sum(C,E,V6)
    | ~ product(F,B,V6)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity3]) ).

fof(distributivity4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5,VAR_6] :
      ( product(VAR_5,VAR_1,VAR_6)
      | ~ sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_6)
      | ~ sum(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_3,VAR_1,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distributivity4) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( product(F,B,V6)
    | ~ sum(C,E,V6)
    | ~ sum(A,D,F)
    | ~ product(D,B,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distributivity4]) ).

fof(multiplication_is_well_defined,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( VAR_2 = VAR_3
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_3)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplication_is_well_defined) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( C = D
    | ~ product(A,B,D)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplication_is_well_defined]) ).

fof(sum_to_multiplicative_identity1,axiom,
    sum(x,y,multiplicative_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',sum_to_multiplicative_identity1) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    sum(x,y,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[sum_to_multiplicative_identity1]) ).

fof(sum_to_multiplicative_identity2,axiom,
    sum(x,z,multiplicative_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',sum_to_multiplicative_identity2) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    sum(x,z,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[sum_to_multiplicative_identity2]) ).

fof(product_to_additive_identity1,axiom,
    product(x,y,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',product_to_additive_identity1) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    product(x,y,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[product_to_additive_identity1]) ).

fof(product_to_additive_identity2,axiom,
    product(x,z,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',product_to_additive_identity2) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    product(x,z,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[product_to_additive_identity2]) ).

fof(prove_both_inverse_are_equal,axiom,
    y != z,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_both_inverse_are_equal) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    y != z,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_both_inverse_are_equal]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    z != y,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_28]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    product(A,B,multiply(B,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_1414,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ product(multiplicative_identity,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_1415,plain,
    A = multiply(multiplicative_identity,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1414,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_725,plain,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1415]) ).

cnf(c_777,plain,
    sum(y,x,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_833,plain,
    sum(z,x,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_1416,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ product(multiplicative_identity,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_953,plain,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,z,y),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1416,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_1417,plain,
    ( product(E,B,F)
    | ~ sum(multiply(D,B),C,F)
    | ~ sum(D,A,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_1418,plain,
    ( product(B,z,C)
    | ~ sum(multiply(A,z),additive_identity,C)
    | ~ sum(A,x,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1417,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_1419,plain,
    ( product(multiplicative_identity,z,A)
    | ~ sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1418,c_777]) ).

cnf(c_1242,plain,
    ~ sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,y),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1419,c_953]) ).

cnf(c_1420,plain,
    ( multiply(A,B) = C
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_1288,plain,
    multiply(A,B) = multiply(B,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1420,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_1421,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(B,D),C,F)
    | ~ product(E,B,F)
    | ~ sum(D,A,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_1422,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(y,A),additive_identity,C)
    | ~ product(B,y,C)
    | ~ sum(A,x,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1421,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_1423,plain,
    ( sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,A)
    | ~ product(multiplicative_identity,y,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1422,c_833]) ).

cnf(c_1424,plain,
    sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,multiply(y,multiplicative_identity)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1423,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_1425,plain,
    sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,multiply(multiplicative_identity,y)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1288,c_1424]) ).

cnf(c_1412,plain,
    sum(multiply(y,z),additive_identity,y),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_725,c_1425]) ).

cnf(c_1413,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1412,c_1242]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : BOO013-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/15.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/15.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/15.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/15.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/15.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/15.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:38:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/15.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/15.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/15.37  % Process 2860286 was started by sandbox on n002,
% 0.10/15.37  % Sat Sep 26 22:38:37 2026
% 0.10/15.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/15.38  
% 0.10/15.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/15.75  
% 0.13/15.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/15.75  
% 0.13/15.75  % Proof 1 at 0.27 (+ 0.10) seconds.
% 0.13/15.75  % Length of proof is 22.
% 0.13/15.75  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.13/15.75  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.13/15.75  % Given clauses 38.
% 0.13/15.75  
% 0.13/15.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------