↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : BOO016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:46:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.45s 1.60s
% Output   : Proof 1.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : BOO016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun  1 15:33:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.45/1.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.45/1.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.45/1.60  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, Y) = multiply(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(add(X, Z), add(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, multiply(Y, Z)) = multiply(add(X, Y), add(X, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(X, Y), Z) = add(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, add(Y, Z)) = add(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, inverse(X)) = multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(inverse(X), X) = multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, inverse(X)) = additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(inverse(X), X) = additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, multiplicative_identity) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(multiplicative_identity, X) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, additive_identity) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(additive_identity, X) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(x, y) = z
% 1.45/1.60  	add(x, z) = x ==> \bottom
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  This holds because
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  E:
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, additive_identity) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, inverse(X)) = multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, multiply(Y, Z)) = multiply(add(X, Y), add(X, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(additive_identity, X) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(inverse(X), X) = multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(add(X, Z), add(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(add(x, z)) = true__
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(x) = false__
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, Y) = multiply(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, add(Y, Z)) = add(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, inverse(X)) = additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, multiplicative_identity) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(X, Y), Z) = add(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(inverse(X), X) = additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(multiplicative_identity, X) = X
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(x, y) = z
% 1.45/1.60  G:
% 1.45/1.60  	true__ = false__
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  This holds because
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, Y) = add(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, Y) = multiply(Y, X)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y0), add(Y0, Y2)) = multiply(Y0, add(multiplicative_identity, Y2))
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y0), add(Y1, Y0)) = multiply(Y0, add(Y1, multiplicative_identity))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, additive_identity) -> X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, inverse(X)) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(X, multiply(Y, Z)) -> multiply(add(X, Y), add(X, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(Y0, Y0) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	add(Y0, multiplicative_identity) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(additive_identity, X) -> X
% 1.45/1.60  	add(inverse(X), X) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiplicative_identity, Y1) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiplicative_identity, inverse(Y0)) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiply(X, Y), Z) -> multiply(add(X, Z), add(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z)) -> multiply(X, add(Y, Z))
% 1.45/1.60  	add(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z)) -> multiply(add(X, Y), Z)
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(add(x, z)) -> true__
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(multiply(add(y, x), add(x, x))) -> true__
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(multiply(x, add(y, x))) -> true__
% 1.45/1.60  	f1(x) -> false__
% 1.45/1.60  	inverse(additive_identity) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	inverse(multiplicative_identity) -> additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, inverse(X)) -> additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(X, multiplicative_identity) -> X
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y0, Y0) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y0, add(Y0, Y0)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y0, add(Y0, Y1)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y0, add(Y0, multiplicative_identity)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y0, add(Y1, Y0)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y1, add(multiplicative_identity, Y1)) -> Y1
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(Y1, additive_identity) -> additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y0), add(Y0, Y2)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y0), add(Y1, Y0)) -> Y0
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y1), add(Y0, multiplicative_identity)) -> add(Y0, Y1)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y1), add(Y1, Y1)) -> Y1
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, Y2), add(multiplicative_identity, Y2)) -> add(Y0, Y2)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, inverse(multiply(Y0, Y1))), add(Y1, inverse(multiply(Y0, Y1)))) -> multiplicative_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y0, multiplicative_identity), add(Y0, Y2)) -> add(Y0, Y2)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(Y1, Y2), add(Y1, Y1)) -> Y1
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(add(multiplicative_identity, Y2), add(Y1, Y2)) -> add(Y1, Y2)
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(additive_identity, Y1) -> additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(inverse(X), X) -> additive_identity
% 1.45/1.60  	multiply(multiplicative_identity, X) -> X
% 1.45/1.60  	true__ -> false__
% 1.45/1.60  	z -> multiply(x, y)
% 1.45/1.60  with the LPO induced by
% 1.45/1.60  	f1 > inverse > additive_identity > multiplicative_identity > z > x > y > add > multiply > true__ > false__
% 1.45/1.60  
% 1.45/1.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.45/1.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------