↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : BOO018-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:35:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 40.27s 40.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 40.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : BOO018-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 19:50:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 40.27/40.39  %-------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 40.27/40.39  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 40.27/40.39  % Transform   :cnf
% 40.27/40.39  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 40.27/40.39  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 40.27/40.39  
% 40.27/40.39  % Result      :Theorem 39.680000s
% 40.27/40.39  % Output      :CNFRefutation 39.680000s
% 40.27/40.39  %-------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  % File     : BOO018-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 40.27/40.39  % Domain   : Boolean Algebra
% 40.27/40.39  % Problem  : Inverse of multiplicative identity = Additive identity
% 40.27/40.39  % Version  : [Ver94] (equality) axioms.
% 40.27/40.39  % English  :
% 40.27/40.39  
% 40.27/40.39  % Refs     : [Ver94] Veroff (1994), Problem Set
% 40.27/40.39  % Source   : [Ver94]
% 40.27/40.39  % Names    : TG [Ver94]
% 40.27/40.39  
% 40.27/40.39  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 40.27/40.39  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.05 v6.3.0, 0.06 v6.2.0, 0.07 v6.1.0, 0.06 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 40.27/40.39  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   1 RR)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Number of literals    :    9 (   9 equ;   1 neg)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   0 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 40.27/40.39  %            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)
% 40.27/40.39  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ
% 40.27/40.39  
% 40.27/40.39  % Comments :
% 40.27/40.39  % Bugfixes : v1.2.1 - Clause prove_inverse_of_1_is_0 fixed.
% 40.27/40.39  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  %----Include boolean algebra axioms for equality formulation
% 40.27/40.39  include('Axioms/BOO004-0.ax').
% 40.27/40.39  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  cnf(prove_inverse_of_1_is_0,negated_conjecture,
% 40.27/40.39      inverse(multiplicative_identity) != additive_identity ).
% 40.27/40.39  
% 40.27/40.39  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  %-------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.39  % Proof found
% 40.27/40.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 40.27/40.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 40.27/40.39  %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:8)
% 40.27/40.39  %VarNum:30(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 40.27/40.39  %MaxLitNum:1
% 40.27/40.39  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 40.27/40.39  %SharedTerms:4
% 40.27/40.39  %goalClause: 17
% 40.27/40.39  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 40.27/40.39  [17]~E(f4(a3),a1)
% 40.27/40.39  [9]E(f2(x91,a1),x91)
% 40.27/40.39  [10]E(f5(x101,a3),x101)
% 40.27/40.39  [11]E(f2(x111,f4(x111)),a3)
% 40.27/40.39  [12]E(f5(x121,f4(x121)),a1)
% 40.27/40.39  [13]E(f2(x131,x132),f2(x132,x131))
% 40.27/40.39  [14]E(f5(x141,x142),f5(x142,x141))
% 40.27/40.40  [15]E(f5(f2(x151,x152),f2(x151,x153)),f2(x151,f5(x152,x153)))
% 40.27/40.40  [16]E(f2(f5(x161,x162),f5(x161,x163)),f5(x161,f2(x162,x163)))
% 40.27/40.40  %EqnAxiom
% 40.27/40.40  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 40.27/40.40  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 40.27/40.40  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 40.27/40.40  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 40.27/40.40  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 40.27/40.40  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63),f5(x62,x63))
% 40.27/40.40  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71),f5(x73,x72))
% 40.27/40.40  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81),f4(x82))
% 40.27/40.40  
% 40.27/40.40  %-------------------------------------------
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(18,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(x181,f2(x181,a1))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,2])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(21,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(x211,f5(x211,a3))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,2])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(24,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(f2(x241,f5(x242,x243)),f5(f2(x241,x242),f2(x241,x243)))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,2])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(28,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(f2(f5(x281,x282),x283),f5(f2(x283,x281),f2(x283,x282)))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,13,16,2,3])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(32,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(f2(f4(x321),x321),a3)),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,11,13,2,3])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(35,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(a3,f2(f4(x351),x351))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[32,2])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(36,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(f4(a1),a3)),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,32,2,3])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(40,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (E(f4(a1),f2(f4(x401),x401))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,36,2,3])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(42,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     (~E(f4(a3),f5(x421,f4(x421)))),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,40,12,2,3])).
% 40.27/40.40  cnf(925,plain,
% 40.27/40.40     ($false),
% 40.27/40.40     inference(scs_inference,[],[42,21,14,3]),
% 40.27/40.40     ['proof']).
% 40.27/40.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 40.27/40.40  % Total time :39.680000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------