↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   63 (  63 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   63 (  62 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  102 (  21 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(pixley1,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X1,X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pixley1) ).

cnf(pixley_defn,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(inverse(X2),X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pixley_defn) ).

cnf(multiply_add_property,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X2,X1),multiply(X3,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_add_property) ).

cnf(additive_inverse,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_inverse) ).

cnf(multiply_add,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_add) ).

cnf(pixley2,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pixley2) ).

cnf(pixley3,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pixley3) ).

cnf(prove_add_multiply,negated_conjecture,
    add(multiply(a,b),b) != b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_add_multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X1,X2) = X2,
    pixley1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X3) = add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),add(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(inverse(X2),X3))),
    pixley_defn ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(inverse(X1),X2))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X2,X1),multiply(X3,X1)),
    multiply_add_property ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = n1,
    additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),X2) = X2,
    multiply_add ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),multiply(X2,n1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(n1,inverse(X1)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)),multiply(X3,X1)) = multiply(X3,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    add(inverse(n1),multiply(X1,n1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X1,n1)) = multiply(X1,n1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(multiply(X2,n1),X1)) = multiply(multiply(X2,n1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X3,X1))),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    add(inverse(n1),n1) = add(X1,n1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,n1),multiply(X2,multiply(X1,n1))) = multiply(multiply(X1,n1),add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(multiply(X1,n1),add(X2,X1))) = multiply(multiply(X1,n1),add(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X3,X1))),X4)) = add(X1,multiply(X4,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    add(X1,n1) = add(X2,n1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X2,add(X1,add(X3,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,n1),add(X1,X1)) = multiply(n1,add(X1,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(n1,add(X1,X1))) = multiply(n1,add(X1,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_18]),c_0_11]),c_0_18]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    add(X1,n1) = multiply(n1,add(X2,add(X3,n1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(multiply(n1,n1),add(X1,n1)) = multiply(n1,add(X1,n1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,n1),add(X2,n1)) = add(X2,n1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,n1),add(X2,multiply(n1,n1))) = add(X2,n1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_30]),c_0_11]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,n1),multiply(inverse(X2),X1)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(inverse(n1),n1) = n1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_17]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiply(n1,multiply(inverse(X1),add(X2,n1))) = multiply(inverse(X1),add(X2,n1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    add(X1,n1) = n1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    add(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = multiply(inverse(X1),add(n1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiply(n1,multiply(inverse(X1),n1)) = multiply(inverse(X1),n1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    add(inverse(X1),inverse(X1)) = multiply(inverse(X1),add(n1,n1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),n1),n1) = multiply(inverse(X1),n1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_38]),c_0_11]),c_0_39]),c_0_36]),c_0_38]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X2) = X1,
    pixley2 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),n1) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_40]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,axiom,
    pixley(X1,X2,X1) = X1,
    pixley3 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(inverse(X2),X2))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    add(inverse(n1),inverse(X1)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),add(multiply(X1,X1),multiply(inverse(X2),X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X2,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    inverse(inverse(n1)) = n1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X1,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X1),add(multiply(X1,n1),X2)) = multiply(add(X1,X1),add(n1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_27]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,n1),inverse(n1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_36]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    multiply(n1,add(X1,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_48]),c_0_36]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X1),n1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_13]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    add(multiply(a,b),b) != b,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_add_multiply]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_52]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,add(X2,X2)),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_52]),c_0_36]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    add(multiply(a,b),b) != b,
    c_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),X2) = multiply(X2,add(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(b,add(a,b)) != b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_59]),c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : BOO024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:51:37 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.59/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2439741 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.59/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.59/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.59/0.64  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.64  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with pid 2439748 completed with status 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Result found by H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.59/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.59/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.59/0.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.59/0.64  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.59/0.64  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.59/0.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % Proof found!
% 0.59/0.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.59/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.59/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.59/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.59/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.59/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 221
% 0.59/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 40
% 0.59/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 74
% 0.59/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 107
% 0.59/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.59/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 59
% 0.59/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 2097
% 0.59/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1636
% 0.59/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 2097
% 0.59/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2129
% 0.59/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 1788
% 0.59/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.59/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 0.59/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 0.59/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.59/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 18
% 0.59/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1360
% 0.59/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1360
% 0.59/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 61
% 0.59/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 0.59/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 87
% 0.59/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 342
% 0.59/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 52
% 0.59/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.59/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 27462
% 0.59/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  % User time                : 0.051 s
% 0.59/0.64  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.59/0.64  % Total time               : 0.058 s
% 0.59/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.59/0.64  
% 0.59/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.64  % User time                : 0.171 s
% 0.59/0.64  % System time              : 0.025 s
% 0.59/0.64  % Total time               : 0.195 s
% 0.59/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.59/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------