%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : BOO027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 5.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_12ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X2,X1),multiply(X3,X1)),
multiply_add_property,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(X1,inverse(X1)) = one,
additive_inverse,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(a,a) != a,
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),multiply(X2,one)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X1,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X2,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : BOO027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:48:38 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % sh5l with pid 3640368 completed with status 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/5.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/5.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3640370 completed with status 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/5.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/5.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.45 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % No proof found!
% 0.15/5.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/5.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.15/5.45 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.15/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 166
% 0.15/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------