%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : BOO027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.08s 0.34s
% Output : Saturation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_12ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X2,X1),multiply(X3,X1)),
multiply_add_property,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(X1,inverse(X1)) = one,
additive_inverse,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(a,a) != a,
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),multiply(X2,one)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X1,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
add(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X2,add(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : BOO027-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:48:22 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2510548 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.08/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.34 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.34 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2510552 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.34 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.34 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.34 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.34 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.34
% 0.08/0.34 % No proof found!
% 0.08/0.34 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.08/0.34 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.34 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.08/0.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.08/0.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.08/0.34 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.08/0.34 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.08/0.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.08/0.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.08/0.34 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.08/0.34 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.08/0.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.08/0.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.08/0.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.08/0.34 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 166
% 0.08/0.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.08/0.34
% 0.08/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.34 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.34 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.34 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.08/0.34
% 0.08/0.34 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.34 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.34 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.08/0.34 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.08/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------