↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO028-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.37s 6.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   63 (  63 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   63 (  62 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  143 (  36 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(l2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X1,X3))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2) ).

cnf(l1,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1) ).

cnf(associativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(b2,axiom,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b2) ).

cnf(b1,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(l4,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4) ).

cnf(associativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_add) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(l3,axiom,
    add(add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3) ).

cnf(prove_multiply_add_property,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(b,c)) != add(multiply(b,a),multiply(c,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_multiply_add_property) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X1,X3))) = X1,
    l2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = X1,
    l1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    b2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(add(X2,X1),X3)) = multiply(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    b1 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    l4 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,add(X3,X1))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,inverse(X1))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    add(add(X1,X2),X3) = add(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),multiply(X2,add(X2,X3))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(X1,X4)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    add(X1,add(multiply(X2,X1),X3)) = add(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(inverse(X2),X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_15]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    add(X1,inverse(inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,multiply(X3,X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,add(X3,X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(add(X2,inverse(X1)),X3)) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_21]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_32]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    add(add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X3)),X2) = X2,
    l3 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,add(X3,multiply(X2,X1)))) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(add(X2,X1),X3)) = add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_44]),c_0_36]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = add(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_46]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),add(X2,multiply(X2,X3))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_23]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(b,c)) != add(multiply(b,a),multiply(c,a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_multiply_add_property]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,multiply(X3,X1))) = multiply(X1,add(X3,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,add(X3,X1))) = add(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,add(b,c)) != add(multiply(b,a),multiply(c,a)),
    c_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) = add(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,multiply(X1,X3))) = multiply(X1,add(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    add(multiply(a,b),multiply(a,c)) != multiply(a,add(b,c)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_18]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)) = multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : BOO028-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/5.49  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.21/5.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/5.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/5.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/5.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/5.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/5.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/5.49  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:51:22 UTC 2026
% 0.21/5.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/5.49  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/5.57  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/5.57  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.37/6.47  % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.37/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.37/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3444741 completed with status 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 6.37/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.37/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.37/6.47  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.37/6.47  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 6.37/6.47  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with pid 3444751 completed with status 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Result found by G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 6.37/6.47  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.37/6.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.37/6.47  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.37/6.47  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 6.37/6.47  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 6.37/6.47  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 6.37/6.47  
% 6.37/6.47  % Proof found!
% 6.37/6.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.37/6.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.37/6.47  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 6.37/6.47  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Initial clauses                      : 11
% 6.37/6.47  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 6.37/6.47  % Processed clauses                    : 5107
% 6.37/6.47  % ...of these trivial                  : 1827
% 6.37/6.47  % ...subsumed                          : 3004
% 6.37/6.47  % ...remaining for further processing  : 276
% 6.37/6.47  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Backward-rewritten                   : 73
% 6.37/6.47  % Generated clauses                    : 54480
% 6.37/6.47  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29827
% 6.37/6.47  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Paramodulations                      : 54480
% 6.37/6.47  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Total rewrite steps                  : 86975
% 6.37/6.47  % ...of those cached                   : 69380
% 6.37/6.47  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.37/6.47  % Current number of processed clauses  : 203
% 6.37/6.47  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 191
% 6.37/6.47  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 6.37/6.47  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 6.37/6.47  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24349
% 6.37/6.47  % ...number of literals in the above   : 24349
% 6.37/6.47  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Current number of archived clauses   : 73
% 6.37/6.47  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 6.37/6.47  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 72
% 6.37/6.47  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1476
% 6.37/6.47  % BW rewrite match successes           : 354
% 6.37/6.47  % Condensation attempts                : 5107
% 6.37/6.47  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.37/6.47  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 482656
% 6.37/6.47  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 6.37/6.47  
% 6.37/6.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.37/6.47  % User time                : 0.782 s
% 6.37/6.47  % System time              : 0.040 s
% 6.37/6.47  % Total time               : 0.823 s
% 6.37/6.47  % Maximum resident set size: 3380 pages
% 6.37/6.47  
% 6.37/6.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.37/6.47  % User time                : 3.660 s
% 6.37/6.47  % System time              : 0.205 s
% 6.37/6.47  % Total time               : 3.865 s
% 6.37/6.47  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 6.37/6.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------