↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : BOO074-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  42 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (  41 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (  17 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(dn1,axiom,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dn1) ).

cnf(huntinton_3,negated_conjecture,
    add(inverse(add(inverse(a),b)),inverse(add(inverse(a),inverse(b)))) != a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',huntinton_3) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X3),inverse(add(X3,X4)))))))) = X3,
    dn1 ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(inverse(X1)),X2)),X1)),X3)),inverse(X1))),X1)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,inverse(X1))),X1)) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X1,X2)))))))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X1,X3)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),inverse(add(inverse(X1),X2)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),inverse(add(inverse(add(X3,X1)),X2)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X1,X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(X1),X1)),inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(X1,X1)))),X1)) = inverse(add(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(X1))))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X1)),inverse(add(X1,X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X1)),inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(add(X1,inverse(X1)),X1)),inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inverse(add(X1,add(X2,X1))) = inverse(add(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_6]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(add(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(X1))))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    add(X1,add(X2,X1)) = add(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_19]),c_0_15]),c_0_19]),c_0_15]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),inverse(add(inverse(X1),X2))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(X1),X2)),inverse(add(X1,X2)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(inverse(add(inverse(X1),X2)),inverse(X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    inverse(add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X2),inverse(add(X2,X1)))))) = inverse(add(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),inverse(X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    inverse(add(X1,inverse(inverse(X1)))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    add(inverse(add(X1,inverse(X2))),X2) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    inverse(add(add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X1,X1))),inverse(X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X2,X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    add(X1,inverse(add(inverse(X2),inverse(add(X2,X1))))) = add(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X2,X1))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_15]),c_0_30]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    inverse(add(inverse(add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),X3)),inverse(add(X3,X1)))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    add(add(X1,X2),X1) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    add(inverse(add(inverse(a),b)),inverse(add(inverse(a),inverse(b)))) != a,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[huntinton_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    add(inverse(X1),inverse(add(X1,X2))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    add(inverse(add(inverse(a),b)),inverse(add(inverse(a),inverse(b)))) != a,
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_36]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    add(inverse(add(b,inverse(a))),inverse(add(inverse(a),inverse(b)))) != a,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    add(inverse(add(X1,X2)),inverse(add(X2,inverse(X1)))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : BOO074-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:52:19 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.38  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2741783 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.56  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.56  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2741787 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.56  % Result found by U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.56  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.56  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.56  
% 0.14/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.36/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 1.36/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 2
% 1.36/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 1.36/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 159
% 1.36/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 79
% 1.36/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 1.36/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 76
% 1.36/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 49
% 1.36/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 5187
% 1.36/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3629
% 1.36/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 5187
% 1.36/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 8198
% 1.36/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 7493
% 1.36/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.36/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 1.36/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 1.36/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.36/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 1.36/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2827
% 1.36/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2827
% 1.36/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 1.36/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 1.36/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 875
% 1.36/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 116
% 1.36/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.36/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 131673
% 1.36/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 1.36/0.56  
% 1.36/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.36/0.56  % User time                : 0.145 s
% 1.36/0.56  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 1.36/0.56  % Total time               : 0.153 s
% 1.36/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 1.36/0.56  
% 1.36/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.36/0.56  % User time                : 0.723 s
% 1.36/0.56  % System time              : 0.051 s
% 1.36/0.56  % Total time               : 0.774 s
% 1.36/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.36/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------