↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : CAT001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  55   ~;  50   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   3 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(domain_is_an_identity_map,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : identity_map(domain(VAR_0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain_is_an_identity_map) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    identity_map(domain(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain_is_an_identity_map]) ).

fof(category_theory_axiom6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( defined(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ identity_map(VAR_1)
      | ~ defined(VAR_1,VAR_2)
      | ~ defined(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',category_theory_axiom6) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( defined(A,C)
    | ~ identity_map(B)
    | ~ defined(B,C)
    | ~ defined(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom6]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( defined(A,C)
    | ~ defined(domain(B),C)
    | ~ defined(A,domain(B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

fof(prove_h_equals_g,axiom,
    h != g,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_h_equals_g) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    h != g,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_h_equals_g]) ).

fof(bg_equals_d,axiom,
    product(b,g,d),
    file('theBenchmark.p',bg_equals_d) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    product(b,g,d),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[bg_equals_d]) ).

fof(bh_equals_d,axiom,
    product(b,h,d),
    file('theBenchmark.p',bh_equals_d) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    product(b,h,d),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[bh_equals_d]) ).

fof(cancellation_for_product,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( VAR_0 = VAR_2
      | ~ product(c,VAR_2,VAR_1)
      | ~ product(c,VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( A = C
    | ~ product(c,C,B)
    | ~ product(c,A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product]) ).

fof(ab_equals_c,axiom,
    product(a,b,c),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ab_equals_c) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    product(a,b,c),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ab_equals_c]) ).

fof(product_on_domain,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : product(VAR_0,domain(VAR_0),VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',product_on_domain) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    product(A,domain(A),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[product_on_domain]) ).

fof(category_theory_axiom5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] :
      ( product(VAR_5,VAR_1,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_3,VAR_0,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_3,VAR_2,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',category_theory_axiom5) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( product(F,B,E)
    | ~ product(D,A,F)
    | ~ product(D,C,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom5]) ).

fof(category_theory_axiom4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
      ( defined(VAR_4,VAR_1)
      | ~ defined(VAR_3,VAR_2)
      | ~ product(VAR_3,VAR_0,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',category_theory_axiom4) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( defined(E,B)
    | ~ defined(D,C)
    | ~ product(D,A,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom4]) ).

fof(category_theory_axiom2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] :
      ( product(VAR_0,VAR_5,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_1,VAR_3,VAR_5)
      | ~ product(VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',category_theory_axiom2) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( product(A,F,E)
    | ~ product(B,D,F)
    | ~ product(C,D,E)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom2]) ).

fof(associative_property2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( defined(VAR_1,VAR_3)
      | ~ defined(VAR_2,VAR_3)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associative_property2) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ( defined(B,D)
    | ~ defined(C,D)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associative_property2]) ).

fof(associative_property1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( defined(VAR_0,VAR_1)
      | ~ product(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associative_property1) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ( defined(A,B)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associative_property1]) ).

fof(closure_of_composition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( product(VAR_0,VAR_1,compose(VAR_0,VAR_1))
      | ~ defined(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',closure_of_composition) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ( product(A,B,compose(A,B))
    | ~ defined(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[closure_of_composition]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    defined(a,b),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    defined(b,h),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_560,plain,
    ( defined(C,domain(B))
    | ~ defined(A,B)
    | ~ product(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_561,plain,
    ( defined(c,domain(b))
    | ~ defined(a,b) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_560,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    defined(c,domain(b)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_561,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_562,plain,
    ( defined(domain(A),B)
    | ~ defined(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    defined(domain(b),h),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_562,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_563,plain,
    ( defined(c,A)
    | ~ defined(domain(b),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_150,plain,
    defined(c,h),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_563,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    product(c,h,compose(c,h)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_564,plain,
    ( product(a,C,B)
    | ~ product(b,A,C)
    | ~ product(c,A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_565,plain,
    ( product(a,A,compose(c,h))
    | ~ product(b,h,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_564,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_499,plain,
    product(a,d,compose(c,h)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_565,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_566,plain,
    ( A = h
    | ~ product(c,A,compose(c,h)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_567,plain,
    g != h,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_12]) ).

cnf(c_507,plain,
    ~ product(c,g,compose(c,h)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_566,c_567]) ).

cnf(c_568,plain,
    ( product(C,g,B)
    | ~ product(A,b,C)
    | ~ product(A,d,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_569,plain,
    ( product(c,g,A)
    | ~ product(a,d,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_568,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_558,plain,
    ~ product(a,d,compose(c,h)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_569,c_507]) ).

cnf(c_559,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_558,c_499]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CAT001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:48:25 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.35  % Process 552775 was started by sandbox2 on n008,
% 0.08/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 22:48:25 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.05 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.13/0.44  % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.13/0.44  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.13/0.44  % Given clauses 141.
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------