%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : CAT001-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:59:52 EDT 2022 % Result : Satisfiable 0.17s 0.43s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CAT001-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 19:44:18 EDT 2022 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.11/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.11/0.35 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d % 0.11/0.35 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp. % 0.11/0.35 # % 0.11/0.35 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.11/0.35 # Number of axioms: 13 Number of unprocessed: 13 % 0.11/0.35 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.11/0.35 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.11/0.35 # Hello from C++ % 0.17/0.43 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.17/0.43 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.17/0.43 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.17/0.43 # 13 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.17/0.43 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.17/0.43 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.17/0.43 # Found 9 unit axioms. % 0.17/0.43 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.17/0.43 # 4 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.17/0.43 # 9 unit axiom clauses % 0.17/0.43 % 0.17/0.43 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.17/0.43 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.17/0.43 # 27635 Satisfiable branch % 0.17/0.43 # Satisfiable branch found. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.17/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.17/0.43 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.17/0.43 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.17/0.43 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.17/0.43 % 0.17/0.43 # End clausification derivation % 0.17/0.43 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_22, hypothesis, (domain(h)=domain(b))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_24, hypothesis, (domain(g)=domain(b))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_23, hypothesis, (codomain(a)=domain(b))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (compose(a,g)=compose(a,h))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (domain(codomain(X1))=codomain(X1))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (codomain(domain(X1))=domain(X1))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(X1,codomain(X1))=X1)). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (compose(domain(X1),X1)=X1)). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (g!=h)). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (domain(compose(X1,X2))=domain(X1)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (codomain(compose(X1,X2))=codomain(X2)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (compose(compose(X1,X2),X3)=compose(X1,compose(X2,X3))|codomain(X2)!=domain(X3)|codomain(X1)!=domain(X2))). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_21, hypothesis, (X1=X2|compose(X1,compose(a,b))!=compose(X2,compose(a,b))|codomain(X2)!=domain(compose(a,b))|codomain(X1)!=domain(compose(a,b)))). % 0.17/0.43 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.17/0.43 # Begin printing tableau % 0.17/0.43 # Found 3 steps % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (g!=h), inference(start_rule)). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (g!=h), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])). % 0.17/0.43 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (compose(g,compose(a,b))!=compose(h,compose(a,b))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])). % 0.17/0.43 # End printing tableau % 0.17/0.43 # SZS output end % 0.17/0.43 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.17/0.43 # Returning from population with 1 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.17/0.43 # We now have 1 tableaux to operate on % 0.17/0.43 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.17/0.43 # Proof search is over... % 0.17/0.43 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------