%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT001-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hhNrDmmrVJ true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:29:55 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.63s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CAT001-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hhNrDmmrVJ true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 10:48:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.62/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.63/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.63/0.80 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.63/0.80 % BCE start: 16
% 0.63/0.80 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.63/0.80 % PE start: 15
% 0.63/0.80 logic: eq
% 0.63/0.80 % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.63/0.80 % done 32 iterations in 0.014s
% 0.63/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.63/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.63/0.80 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(bh_equals_bg, axiom, (( compose @ b @ h ) = ( compose @ b @ g ))).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, (((compose @ b @ h) = (compose @ b @ g))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [bh_equals_bg])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(monomorphism, axiom,
% 0.63/0.80 (( ( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ X ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 0.63/0.80 ( ( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ Z ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 (((compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ X1) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ X2) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monomorphism])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 0.63/0.80 (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.63/0.80 ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.63/0.80 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.63/0.80 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl100, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 (((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X1)) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X2)) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.63/0.80 [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl102, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 (((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h)) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X1)) != (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((g) = (X1)))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl100])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 0.63/0.80 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.63/0.80 (((g) = (X0))
% 0.63/0.80 | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.63/0.80 != (compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h))))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl102])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl121, plain, (((g) = (h))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(prove_h_equals_g, conjecture, (( h ) = ( g ))).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( h ) != ( g )),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_h_equals_g])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((h) != (g))),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.63/0.80 thf(zip_derived_cl122, plain, ($false),
% 0.63/0.80 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.63/0.80 [zip_derived_cl121, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.63/0.80
% 0.63/0.80 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.63/0.80
% 0.63/0.80
% 0.63/0.80 % Terminating...
% 1.66/0.89 % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/0.90 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------