↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CAT002-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CAT002-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 19:31:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Sun May 29 19:31:39 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8728.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -there_exists(A)| -there_exists(B)|A!=B|equivalent(A,B).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [copy,35,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  35 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.36  35 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.36  35 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 14
% 0.13/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 27
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 51
% 0.13/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.13/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.13/0.38     distinct function count: 4
% 0.13/0.38     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.04 sec ----> 127 [binary,125.1,16.1] {+} $F.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  13 [] {+} compose(a,A)!=B|compose(a,C)!=B|A=C.
% 0.20/0.42  14 [] {+} compose(b,A)!=B|compose(b,C)!=B|A=C.
% 0.20/0.42  15 [] {-} g!=h.
% 0.20/0.42  16 [copy,15,flip.1] {+} h!=g.
% 0.20/0.42  20 [] {-} compose(A,compose(B,C))=compose(compose(A,B),C).
% 0.20/0.42  22,21 [copy,20,flip.1] {-} compose(compose(A,B),C)=compose(A,compose(B,C)).
% 0.20/0.42  32 [] {-} compose(compose(a,b),h)=compose(compose(a,b),g).
% 0.20/0.42  33 [copy,32,demod,22,22] {-} compose(a,compose(b,h))=compose(a,compose(b,g)).
% 0.20/0.42  35 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.20/0.42  121 [hyper,33,13,35,flip.1] {-} compose(b,h)=compose(b,g).
% 0.20/0.42  125 [hyper,121,14,35,flip.1] {-} h=g.
% 0.20/0.42  127 [binary,125.1,16.1] {+} $F.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  true clauses given           1      (12.5%)
% 0.20/0.42  false clauses given          7
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.20/0.42     3  0         1
% 0.20/0.42     4  0         1
% 0.20/0.42     5  0         3
% 0.20/0.42     6  0         4
% 0.20/0.42     7  1         2
% 0.20/0.42     8  0         3
% 0.20/0.42     9  0         4
% 0.20/0.42    10  0         6
% 0.20/0.42    11  0         7
% 0.20/0.42    12  1         11
% 0.20/0.42    13  1         4
% 0.20/0.42    14  0         2
% 0.20/0.42    15  1         0
% 0.20/0.42    16  0         11
% 0.20/0.42    17  0         12
% 0.20/0.42    18  0         4
% 0.20/0.42    21  2         1
% 0.20/0.42    25  1         0
% 0.20/0.42  tot:  7         76      (91.6% true)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Process 8728 finished Sun May 29 19:31:39 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------