↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : CAT002-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  13   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_g_equals_h,axiom,
    g != h,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_g_equals_h) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    g != h,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_g_equals_h]) ).

fof(ab_h_equals_ab_g,axiom,
    compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(a,b),g),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ab_h_equals_ab_g) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(a,b),g),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ab_h_equals_ab_g]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    compose(compose(a,b),g) = compose(compose(a,b),h),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_5]) ).

fof(cancellation_for_compose2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( VAR_0 = VAR_2
      | compose(b,VAR_2) != VAR_1
      | compose(b,VAR_0) != VAR_1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_compose2) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( A = C
    | compose(b,C) != B
    | compose(b,A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_compose2]) ).

fof(cancellation_for_compose1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( VAR_0 = VAR_2
      | compose(a,VAR_2) != VAR_1
      | compose(a,VAR_0) != VAR_1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_compose1) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( A = C
    | compose(a,C) != B
    | compose(a,A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_compose1]) ).

fof(associativity_of_compose,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : compose(VAR_0,compose(VAR_1,VAR_2)) = compose(compose(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_2),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_compose) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    compose(A,compose(B,C)) = compose(compose(A,B),C),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity_of_compose]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    compose(compose(A,B),C) = compose(A,compose(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_13]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    compose(a,compose(b,g)) = compose(compose(a,b),h),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    compose(a,compose(b,g)) = compose(a,compose(b,h)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    ( A = B
    | compose(b,A) != compose(b,B) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_8]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    compose(b,g) != compose(b,h),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( B = A
    | compose(a,A) != compose(a,B) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_9]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    compose(b,h) = compose(b,g),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    compose(b,g) = compose(b,h),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CAT002-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:47:59 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.36  % Process 1314153 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.12/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 22:47:59 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.38  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.12/0.38  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.12/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.12/0.38  % Given clauses 14.
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------