↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT002-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QOrPhp5fqs true

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:29:55 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CAT002-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QOrPhp5fqs true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:46:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.68  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.68  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.68  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.61/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.61/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.61/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.61/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.62/0.80  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.62/0.80  % BCE start: 17
% 0.62/0.80  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.62/0.80  % PE start: 16
% 0.62/0.80  logic: eq
% 0.62/0.80  % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.62/0.80  % done 34 iterations in 0.016s
% 0.62/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.62/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/0.80  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(ab_h_equals_ab_g, axiom,
% 0.62/0.80    (( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ h ) =
% 0.62/0.80     ( compose @ ( compose @ a @ b ) @ g ))).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (((compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ h) = (compose @ (compose @ a @ b) @ g))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ab_h_equals_ab_g])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 0.62/0.80    (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.62/0.80     ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.62/0.80           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.62/0.80           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl81, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h)) = (compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ g)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.62/0.80                [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(cancellation_for_compose1, axiom,
% 0.62/0.80    (( ( compose @ a @ X ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ a @ Z ) != ( Y ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.80     ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         (((compose @ a @ X1) != (X0))
% 0.62/0.80          | ((compose @ a @ X2) != (X0))
% 0.62/0.80          | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_compose1])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ a @ X1) != (compose @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl100, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         (((X0) = (compose @ b @ g))
% 0.62/0.80          | ((compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ h)) != (compose @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl81, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl114, plain, (((compose @ b @ h) = (compose @ b @ g))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl100])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(cancellation_for_compose2, axiom,
% 0.62/0.80    (( ( compose @ b @ X ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ b @ Z ) != ( Y ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.80     ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         (((compose @ b @ X1) != (X0))
% 0.62/0.80          | ((compose @ b @ X2) != (X0))
% 0.62/0.80          | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_compose2])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.80         (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ b @ X1) != (compose @ b @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl121, plain,
% 0.62/0.80      (![X0 : $i]: (((X0) = (g)) | ((compose @ b @ h) != (compose @ b @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl114, zip_derived_cl52])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl127, plain, (((h) = (g))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl121])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(prove_g_equals_h, conjecture, (( g ) = ( h ))).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( g ) != ( h )),
% 0.62/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_g_equals_h])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((g) != (h))),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.62/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl128, plain, ($false),
% 0.62/0.80      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.62/0.80                [zip_derived_cl127, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.62/0.80  
% 0.62/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.62/0.80  
% 0.62/0.80  
% 0.62/0.80  % Terminating...
% 0.68/0.89  % Runner terminated.
% 1.67/0.90  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------