%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : lazyCoP---0.1 % Problem : CAT002-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:03:25 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 11.66s 1.85s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CAT002-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 17:29:43 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 11.66/1.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 11.66/1.85 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c0, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 h != g). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c1, plain, % 11.66/1.85 h != g, % 11.66/1.85 inference(start, [], [c0])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c2, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 X0 = X1 | compose(b,X0) != compose(b,X1)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a0, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 g = X1). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c3, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c4, plain, % 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) != compose(b,X1), % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c5, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X0 != X2 | h != X2, % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a1, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X0 = X2). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c6, plain, % 11.66/1.85 h != X2, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a2, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 h = X2). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c7, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c6])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c8, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 X3 = X4 | compose(a,X3) != compose(a,X4)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a3, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X1) = X3). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c9, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c10, plain, % 11.66/1.85 compose(a,X3) != compose(a,X4), % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c11, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X4 != X5 | compose(b,X0) != X5, % 11.66/1.85 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a4, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X4 = X5). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c12, plain, % 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) != X5, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c11])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a5, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 compose(b,X0) = X5). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c13, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c12])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c14, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 compose(X6,compose(X7,X8)) = compose(compose(X6,X7),X8)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a6, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 compose(a,X3) = compose(X6,compose(X7,X8))). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c15, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c16, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c17, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X9 != compose(compose(X6,X7),X8) | X9 != compose(a,X4), % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c18, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(a,b),g)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a7, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(X6,X7),X8) = compose(compose(a,b),g)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c19, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X9 != compose(a,X4), % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c20, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c21, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X10 != compose(compose(a,b),h) | X9 != X10, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c22, axiom, % 11.66/1.85 compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a8, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 compose(compose(a,b),h) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c23, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X9 != X10, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c24, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c25, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X14 != compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) | X10 != X14, % 11.66/1.85 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a9, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X14 = compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c26, plain, % 11.66/1.85 X10 != X14, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c25])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a10, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X10 = X14). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c27, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c26])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a11, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X9 = X10). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c28, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c23])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(a12, assumption, % 11.66/1.85 X9 = compose(a,X4)). % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c29, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c19])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 cnf(c30, plain, % 11.66/1.85 $false, % 11.66/1.85 inference(constraint_solving, [ % 11.66/1.85 bind(X0, h), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X1, g), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X2, h), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X3, compose(b,X1)), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X4, compose(b,X0)), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X5, compose(b,X0)), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X6, a), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X7, b), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X8, g), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X9, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X10, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X11, a), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X12, b), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X13, h), % 11.66/1.85 bind(X14, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))) % 11.66/1.85 ], % 11.66/1.85 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12])). % 11.66/1.85 % 11.66/1.85 % SZS output end IncompleteProof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------